Supernovae Ia Light Curves Show a Static Universe - Revision history

ClaudeBot: infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

2026-07-21T13:28:45Z

infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:28, 21 July 2026
Line 6:		Line 6:
	\| published = 2012		\| published = 2012
	\| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]		\| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]
	\| volume = [[9]]		\| volume = 9
	\| num_pages = 3		\| num_pages = 3
	\| pages = 17-19		\| pages = 17-19

ClaudeBot: Add to Category:Time

2026-07-20T13:42:13Z

Add to Category:Time

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:42, 20 July 2026
Line 22:		Line 22:

	[[Category:Cosmology\|supernovae ia light curves static universe]]		[[Category:Cosmology\|supernovae ia light curves static universe]]

			[[Category:Time]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:57:39Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:57, 1 January 2017
Line 21:		Line 21:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|supernovae ia light curves static universe]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|supernovae ia light curves static universe]]

	[[Category:Cosmology]]		[[Category:Cosmology\|supernovae ia light curves static universe]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T18:08:05Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:08, 1 January 2017
Line 19:		Line 19:
	Together, both sets of data are consistent with a Universe that did expand in the past but stopped expanding some time ago. The density of the Universe would then be equal to the critical density and we would have reached the point where the expansion has been arrested. There is then no need for inflation, ?dark energy' or ?dark matter.' However, in this static epoch of the Universe the Hydrogen clouds and supernovae at low redshifts have differing redshifts dependent on distance. It is proposed that in this scenario, redshifts are due to the New Tired Light theory alone.		Together, both sets of data are consistent with a Universe that did expand in the past but stopped expanding some time ago. The density of the Universe would then be equal to the critical density and we would have reached the point where the expansion has been arrested. There is then no need for inflation, ?dark energy' or ?dark matter.' However, in this static epoch of the Universe the Hydrogen clouds and supernovae at low redshifts have differing redshifts dependent on distance. It is proposed that in this scenario, redshifts are due to the New Tired Light theory alone.

	[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|supernovae ia light curves static universe]]

	[[Category:Cosmology]]		[[Category:Cosmology]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T05:55:39Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Supernovae Ia Light Curves Show a Static Universe
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6503.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Lyndon E Ashmore]]
| keywords = [[time dilation]], [[supernova]], [[expansion]], [[static universe]]
| published = 2012
| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]
| volume = [[9]]
| num_pages = 3
| pages = 17-19
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6503.pdf here]

==Abstract==

HHigh redshift broadening of supernovae light curves, taken at face value, is the only direct evidence for expansion and is often used to discount Tired Light Theories. However, the authors of these papers look at high redshifts since these results are said to give ?conclusive evidence for expansion.? But what of the smaller redshifts?, what do they show? This paper reviews supernovae aging data and shows that if we ignore Malmquist biases and that fact that brighter supernova Ia do have intrinsically broader light curves, then the main stream supernovae evidence is that whilst there may be expansion at high redshifts, there is no time dilation and therefore no expansion at low redshifts. That is, if we are to believe the main stream version of supernovae light curves then we must believe that the Universe is presently static. These results are then compared to average Hydrogen cloud separation in the Lyman alpha forest in quasar spectra. These also show that at high redshifts the average spacing between Hydrogen clouds reduces as the redshift increases ? showing evidence that the clouds are moving further apart with time and therefore expansion. However, at low redshifts the average spacing is constant - again showing a static Universe in the region. Is it just coincidence that both sets of data show expansion at high redshifts and a static Universe at low redshifts?

Together, both sets of data are consistent with a Universe that did expand in the past but stopped expanding some time ago. The density of the Universe would then be equal to the critical density and we would have reached the point where the expansion has been arrested. There is then no need for inflation, ?dark energy' or ?dark matter.' However, in this static epoch of the Universe the Hydrogen clouds and supernovae at low redshifts have differing redshifts dependent on distance. It is proposed that in this scenario, redshifts are due to the New Tired Light theory alone.

[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Cosmology]]