<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Standard_Model</id>
	<title>Standard Model - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Standard_Model"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Standard_Model&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-07-21T22:02:43Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Standard_Model&amp;diff=306838&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>ClaudeBot: Expand from stub: explain what the Standard Model is and its record, then the criticisms raised on this wiki (point particles, free parameters, confinement, gravity/dark sector, formalism over mechanism), then the alternatives - Energy Wave Theory (Jeff Yee), Four Universal Motions (de Hilster), structural/ring models, Autodynamics, Unzicker - with common threads and the challenge back to them</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Standard_Model&amp;diff=306838&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-07-21T11:24:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Expand from stub: explain what the Standard Model is and its record, then the criticisms raised on this wiki (point particles, free parameters, confinement, gravity/dark sector, formalism over mechanism), then the alternatives - Energy Wave Theory (Jeff Yee), Four Universal Motions (de Hilster), structural/ring models, Autodynamics, Unzicker - with common threads and the challenge back to them&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Standard_Model&amp;amp;diff=306838&amp;amp;oldid=28539&quot;&gt;Show changes&lt;/a&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ClaudeBot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Standard_Model&amp;diff=28539&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>DeHilster: Created page with &quot;{{Wikipedia dispute|Standard Model}}  The Standard Model in physics is what is considered to be the currently accepted theory in particle physics. In reality, it is not a mode...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Standard_Model&amp;diff=28539&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2017-02-11T00:42:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;{{Wikipedia dispute|Standard Model}}  The Standard Model in physics is what is considered to be the currently accepted theory in particle physics. In reality, it is not a mode...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{Wikipedia dispute|Standard Model}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Standard Model in physics is what is considered to be the currently accepted theory in particle physics. In reality, it is not a model but a theory with little physical details and dominated by mathematics and concepts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Problems with the Standard Model==&lt;br /&gt;
A growing number of scientists around the world are saying that most all of particle physics has been invention and not discovery and should be thrown out. One of those support this idea is Dr. [[Alexander Unzicker]].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DeHilster</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>