Sagnac and Gravitation - Revision history

ClaudeBot: infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

2026-07-21T13:28:42Z

infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:28, 21 July 2026
Line 4:		Line 4:
	\| keywords = [[Sagnac effect]], [[gravitation]], [[non-Euclidean geometry]], [[ether]]		\| keywords = [[Sagnac effect]], [[gravitation]], [[non-Euclidean geometry]], [[ether]]
	\| published = 1992		\| published = 1992
	\| volume = [[3]]		\| volume = 3
	\| number = [[1]]		\| number = 1
	\| pages = 9-12		\| pages = 9-12
	}}		}}

ClaudeBot: Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup)

2026-07-18T23:30:53Z

Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:30, 18 July 2026
Line 4:		Line 4:
	\| keywords = [[Sagnac effect]], [[gravitation]], [[non-Euclidean geometry]], [[ether]]		\| keywords = [[Sagnac effect]], [[gravitation]], [[non-Euclidean geometry]], [[ether]]
	\| published = 1992		\| published = 1992
	~~\| journal = [[None]]~~
	\| volume = [[3]]		\| volume = [[3]]
	\| number = [[1]]		\| number = [[1]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:54:45Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:54, 1 January 2017
Line 16:		Line 16:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|sagnac gravitation]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|sagnac gravitation]]

	[[Category:Gravity]]		[[Category:Gravity\|sagnac gravitation]]
	[[Category:Aether]]		[[Category:Aether\|sagnac gravitation]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T18:02:40Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:02, 1 January 2017
Line 12:		Line 12:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	The Einstein theory is sometimes incorrectly accused of being unable to explain the Sagnac effect (even for an unclosed path configuration). However, its explanation reveals that it works with the gravitational field as the equivalent of an ether, in which the velocity of light is not constant unless space is distorted into a non-Euclidean geometry so as to force its constancy. Although not wrong in the sense of disagreeing with experimental results, this mathematical formalism is complicated, opaque and unnecessary, for it is easily replaced by very simple mathematics in Euclidean space yielding the same result when it is assumed that the velocity of light is constant with respect to the local gravitational field; this requires no special non-Euclidean space.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		The Einstein theory is sometimes incorrectly accused of being unable to explain the Sagnac effect (even for an unclosed path configuration). However, its explanation reveals that it works with the gravitational field as the equivalent of an ether, in which the velocity of light is not constant unless space is distorted into a non-Euclidean geometry so as to force its constancy. Although not wrong in the sense of disagreeing with experimental results, this mathematical formalism is complicated, opaque and unnecessary, for it is easily replaced by very simple mathematics in Euclidean space yielding the same result when it is assumed that the velocity of light is constant with respect to the local gravitational field; this requires no special non-Euclidean space.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|sagnac gravitation]]

	[[Category:Gravity]]		[[Category:Gravity]]
	[[Category:Aether]]		[[Category:Aether]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T05:55:20Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Sagnac and Gravitation
| author = [[Petr Beckmann]]
| keywords = [[Sagnac effect]], [[gravitation]], [[non-Euclidean geometry]], [[ether]]
| published = 1992
| journal = [[None]]
| volume = [[3]]
| number = [[1]]
| pages = 9-12
}}

==Abstract==

The Einstein theory is sometimes incorrectly accused of being unable to explain the Sagnac effect (even for an unclosed path configuration). However, its explanation reveals that it works with the gravitational field as the equivalent of an ether, in which the velocity of light is not constant unless space is distorted into a non-Euclidean geometry so as to force its constancy. Although not wrong in the sense of disagreeing with experimental results, this mathematical formalism is complicated, opaque and unnecessary, for it is easily replaced by very simple mathematics in Euclidean space yielding the same result when it is assumed that the velocity of light is constant with respect to the local gravitational field; this requires no special non-Euclidean space.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Gravity]]
[[Category:Aether]]