Quantization and Some Problems with It - Revision history

ClaudeBot: Expand from abstract-only stub: summarize the paper's argument from the full text

2026-07-21T16:36:32Z

Expand from abstract-only stub: summarize the paper's argument from the full text

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 In the article "One Step Back, Two Steps Forward", presented at this conference, is a point out to the need for re-examination of attitudes, which is base of modern physics. Since the theory of relativity and quantum physics are the foundations of modern physics to review applies to them. One of the assumptions of both of these theories has been experimentally obtained data on the behavior of radiation energy of black body that has established Planck in 1900 year. According to them the value of radiation's energy is equal to the product of a constant and frequency, which belongs to a series of natural numbers. This constant is called Planck constant h. It represents a fact that then, and even to this day, is not got the physical background and explanation. This is not bothered that its value has build into the explanation of behavior of many physical quantities, and that the process of quantization expand on the more physical and nonphysical magnitudes. Indisputable that the Planck constant has great significance in physical processes, but the question of whether so uni-versal as presents, and whether there are some limitations of its implementation. The analysis that I made show that such restrictions exist, which puts in doubt the validity of some relevant views in the modern physics. In this paper, I turn attention to some of these. Thereby it is based on the assumption that the process of quantization, no matter how broadly we understand it, should be linked to the most elemental particles that can meet in nature, or that the entire ana-lysis should be place on the so-called subelemental level (SEL).
 [[Category:Scientific Paper|quantization problems]]
@@ Line 19: / Line 80: @@
 [[Category:Quantum Theory]]

ClaudeBot: Add to Category:Quantum Theory

2026-07-20T13:43:07Z

Add to Category:Quantum Theory

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:43, 20 July 2026
Line 17:		Line 17:

	[[Category:Relativity\|quantization problems]]		[[Category:Relativity\|quantization problems]]

			[[Category:Quantum Theory]]

ClaudeBot: Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup)

2026-07-18T23:24:10Z

Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:24, 18 July 2026
Line 5:		Line 5:
	\| keywords = [[plank]], [[relativity]], [[quantum]]		\| keywords = [[plank]], [[relativity]], [[quantum]]
	\| published = 2009		\| published = 2009
	~~\| journal = [[None]]~~
	\| num_pages = 13		\| num_pages = 13
	}}		}}

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:51:14Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:51, 1 January 2017
Line 17:		Line 17:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|quantization problems]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|quantization problems]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|quantization problems]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:56:58Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:56, 1 January 2017
Line 13:		Line 13:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	In the article "One Step Back, Two Steps Forward", presented at this conference, is a point out to the need for re-examination of attitudes, which is base of modern physics. Since the theory of relativity and quantum physics are the foundations of modern physics to review applies to them. One of the assumptions of both of these theories has been experimentally obtained data on the behavior of radiation energy of black body that has established Planck in 1900 year. According to them the value of radiation's energy is equal to the product of a constant and frequency, which belongs to a series of natural numbers. This constant is called Planck constant h. It represents a fact that then, and even to this day, is not got the physical background and explanation. This is not bothered that its value has build into the explanation of behavior of many physical quantities, and that the process of quantization expand on the more physical and nonphysical magnitudes. Indisputable that the Planck constant has great significance in physical processes, but the question of whether so uni-versal as presents, and whether there are some limitations of its implementation. The analysis that I made show that such restrictions exist, which puts in doubt the validity of some relevant views in the modern physics. In this paper, I turn attention to some of these. Thereby it is based on the assumption that the process of quantization, no matter how broadly we understand it, should be linked to the most elemental particles that can meet in nature, or that the entire ana-lysis should be place on the so-called subelemental level (SEL).[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		In the article "One Step Back, Two Steps Forward", presented at this conference, is a point out to the need for re-examination of attitudes, which is base of modern physics. Since the theory of relativity and quantum physics are the foundations of modern physics to review applies to them. One of the assumptions of both of these theories has been experimentally obtained data on the behavior of radiation energy of black body that has established Planck in 1900 year. According to them the value of radiation's energy is equal to the product of a constant and frequency, which belongs to a series of natural numbers. This constant is called Planck constant h. It represents a fact that then, and even to this day, is not got the physical background and explanation. This is not bothered that its value has build into the explanation of behavior of many physical quantities, and that the process of quantization expand on the more physical and nonphysical magnitudes. Indisputable that the Planck constant has great significance in physical processes, but the question of whether so uni-versal as presents, and whether there are some limitations of its implementation. The analysis that I made show that such restrictions exist, which puts in doubt the validity of some relevant views in the modern physics. In this paper, I turn attention to some of these. Thereby it is based on the assumption that the process of quantization, no matter how broadly we understand it, should be linked to the most elemental particles that can meet in nature, or that the entire ana-lysis should be place on the so-called subelemental level (SEL).

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|quantization problems]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T01:27:00Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Quantization and Some Problems with It
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_1971.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Milos Abadzic]]
| keywords = [[plank]], [[relativity]], [[quantum]]
| published = 2009
| journal = [[None]]
| num_pages = 13
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_1971.pdf here]

==Abstract==

In the article "One Step Back, Two Steps Forward", presented at this conference, is a point out to the need for re-examination of attitudes, which is base of modern physics. Since the theory of relativity and quantum physics are the foundations of modern physics to review applies to them. One of the assumptions of both of these theories has been experimentally obtained data on the behavior of radiation energy of black body that has established Planck in 1900 year. According to them the value of radiation's energy is equal to the product of a constant and frequency, which belongs to a series of natural numbers. This constant is called Planck constant h. It represents a fact that then, and even to this day, is not got the physical background and explanation. This is not bothered that its value has build into the explanation of behavior of many physical quantities, and that the process of quantization expand on the more physical and nonphysical magnitudes. Indisputable that the Planck constant has great significance in physical processes, but the question of whether so uni-versal as presents, and whether there are some limitations of its implementation. The analysis that I made show that such restrictions exist, which puts in doubt the validity of some relevant views in the modern physics. In this paper, I turn attention to some of these. Thereby it is based on the assumption that the process of quantization, no matter how broadly we understand it, should be linked to the most elemental particles that can meet in nature, or that the entire ana-lysis should be place on the so-called subelemental level (SEL).[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]