Practicism: The Unifying Body of Understanding for Everything - Revision history

ClaudeBot: restore quotation marks lost to the encoding bug (paired conversions only; URLs, questions and German pages untouched)

2026-07-22T17:59:32Z

restore quotation marks lost to the encoding bug (paired conversions only; URLs, questions and German pages untouched)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:59, 22 July 2026
Line 11:		Line 11:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	Our current sciences and practices are largely based on the underlying assumptions, structures and nature of philosophy. Consequently both Aristotle and logician Charles Sanders Peirce organized the sciences based on hierarchical differentiations. Metaphysics also is mostly based on these hierarchies, with one leading concept dictating the meaning of all others. Thus, our current sciences are still reductionist and partial, mostly because people concentrate on understanding more and more of a relatively ?small? part of the whole. Then, because of the functional differentiations and the underlying structure of our current sciences and practices, real true great understandings at even higher levels can never be reached. This paper will try to explain an alternative understanding for everything by means of my Phronesis Meta-semeiotics.		Our current sciences and practices are largely based on the underlying assumptions, structures and nature of philosophy. Consequently both Aristotle and logician Charles Sanders Peirce organized the sciences based on hierarchical differentiations. Metaphysics also is mostly based on these hierarchies, with one leading concept dictating the meaning of all others. Thus, our current sciences are still reductionist and partial, mostly because people concentrate on understanding more and more of a relatively "small" part of the whole. Then, because of the functional differentiations and the underlying structure of our current sciences and practices, real true great understandings at even higher levels can never be reached. This paper will try to explain an alternative understanding for everything by means of my Phronesis Meta-semeiotics.

	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|practicism unifying body understanding]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|practicism unifying body understanding]]

	[[Category:Relativity\|practicism unifying body understanding]]		[[Category:Relativity\|practicism unifying body understanding]]

ClaudeBot: Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup)

2026-07-18T23:40:30Z

Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:40, 18 July 2026
Line 4:		Line 4:
	\| author = [[Wilfred T M Berendsen]]		\| author = [[Wilfred T M Berendsen]]
	\| published = 2011		\| published = 2011
	~~\| journal = [[None]]~~
	\| num_pages = 3		\| num_pages = 3
	}}		}}

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:50:33Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:50, 1 January 2017
Line 16:		Line 16:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|practicism unifying body understanding]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|practicism unifying body understanding]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|practicism unifying body understanding]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:55:39Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:55, 1 January 2017
Line 12:		Line 12:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	Our current sciences and practices are largely based on the underlying assumptions, structures and nature of philosophy. Consequently both Aristotle and logician Charles Sanders Peirce organized the sciences based on hierarchical differentiations. Metaphysics also is mostly based on these hierarchies, with one leading concept dictating the meaning of all others. Thus, our current sciences are still reductionist and partial, mostly because people concentrate on understanding more and more of a relatively ?small? part of the whole. Then, because of the functional differentiations and the underlying structure of our current sciences and practices, real true great understandings at even higher levels can never be reached. This paper will try to explain an alternative understanding for everything by means of my Phronesis Meta-semeiotics.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		Our current sciences and practices are largely based on the underlying assumptions, structures and nature of philosophy. Consequently both Aristotle and logician Charles Sanders Peirce organized the sciences based on hierarchical differentiations. Metaphysics also is mostly based on these hierarchies, with one leading concept dictating the meaning of all others. Thus, our current sciences are still reductionist and partial, mostly because people concentrate on understanding more and more of a relatively ?small? part of the whole. Then, because of the functional differentiations and the underlying structure of our current sciences and practices, real true great understandings at even higher levels can never be reached. This paper will try to explain an alternative understanding for everything by means of my Phronesis Meta-semeiotics.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|practicism unifying body understanding]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T18:39:36Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Practicism: The Unifying Body of Understanding for Everything
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6036.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Wilfred T M Berendsen]]
| published = 2011
| journal = [[None]]
| num_pages = 3
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6036.pdf here]

==Abstract==

Our current sciences and practices are largely based on the underlying assumptions, structures and nature of philosophy. Consequently both Aristotle and logician Charles Sanders Peirce organized the sciences based on hierarchical differentiations. Metaphysics also is mostly based on these hierarchies, with one leading concept dictating the meaning of all others. Thus, our current sciences are still reductionist and partial, mostly because people concentrate on understanding more and more of a relatively ?small? part of the whole. Then, because of the functional differentiations and the underlying structure of our current sciences and practices, real true great understandings at even higher levels can never be reached. This paper will try to explain an alternative understanding for everything by means of my Phronesis Meta-semeiotics.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]