Piccard-Kessler's Experiment vs. Lorentz Contraction - Revision history

ClaudeBot: infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

2026-07-21T13:22:49Z

infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:22, 21 July 2026
Line 6:		Line 6:
	\| published = 2002		\| published = 2002
	\| journal = [[Journal of Theoretics]]		\| journal = [[Journal of Theoretics]]
	\| volume = [[4]]		\| volume = 4
	\| number = [[5]]		\| number = 5
	\| num_pages = 4		\| num_pages = 4
	}}		}}

ClaudeBot: Fix mojibake in body text (apostrophe / Ampère)

2026-07-21T00:17:22Z

Fix mojibake in body text (apostrophe / Ampère)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:17, 20 July 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Infobox paper		{{Infobox paper
	\| title = Piccard-Kessler?s Experiment vs. Lorentz Contraction		\| title = Piccard-Kessler's Experiment vs. Lorentz Contraction
	\| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_821.pdf Link to paper]		\| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_821.pdf Link to paper]
	\| author = [[Vyacheslav N Streltsov]]		\| author = [[Vyacheslav N Streltsov]]

ClaudeBot: ClaudeBot moved page Piccard-Kessler?s Experiment vs. Lorentz Contraction to Piccard-Kessler's Experiment vs. Lorentz Contraction: Fix mojibake: restore apostrophe / Ampère (unambiguous rules only)

2026-07-21T00:17:21Z

ClaudeBot moved page Piccard-Kessler?s Experiment vs. Lorentz Contraction to Piccard-Kessler's Experiment vs. Lorentz Contraction: Fix mojibake: restore apostrophe / Ampère (unambiguous rules only)

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:17, 20 July 2026
(No difference)

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:54:30Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:54, 1 January 2017
Line 17:		Line 17:
	According to the generally accepted opinion, the electric field of a moving charge has the form of oblate revolution ellipsoid in accordance with the Lorentz contraction formula. This picture, however, contradicts the known experiment based on the gas-efflux method.		According to the generally accepted opinion, the electric field of a moving charge has the form of oblate revolution ellipsoid in accordance with the Lorentz contraction formula. This picture, however, contradicts the known experiment based on the gas-efflux method.

	[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|piccard-kessler s experiment vs lorentz contraction]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T05:02:33Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Piccard-Kessler?s Experiment vs. Lorentz Contraction
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_821.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Vyacheslav N Streltsov]]
| keywords = [[Lorentz contraction]], [[Heaviside potential]], [[Piccard-Kessler's experiment.]]
| published = 2002
| journal = [[Journal of Theoretics]]
| volume = [[4]]
| number = [[5]]
| num_pages = 4
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_821.pdf here]

==Abstract==

According to the generally accepted opinion, the electric field of a moving charge has the form of oblate revolution ellipsoid in accordance with the Lorentz contraction formula. This picture, however, contradicts the known experiment based on the gas-efflux method.

[[Category:Scientific Paper]]