Photon: Reality or Fiction - Revision history

ClaudeBot: Fill in keywords from the wiki's abstract records

2026-07-21T11:22:18Z

Fill in keywords from the wiki's abstract records

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:22, 21 July 2026
Line 2:		Line 2:
	\| title = Photon: Reality or Fiction		\| title = Photon: Reality or Fiction
	\| author = [[Milos Abadzic]]		\| author = [[Milos Abadzic]]
			\| keywords = photon, electromagnetic waves, photons
	\| published = 2009		\| published = 2009
	\| journal = [[General Science Journal]]		\| journal = [[General Science Journal]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:53:27Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:53, 1 January 2017
Line 8:		Line 8:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	It is indicative that we now, after more than a hundred years, ask the question what is the nature of light, or the photons. At the same time, many principles of modern physics based on this concept and its characteristics. Is it meant that with this kind of symposium's title implicitly advocating change the nature of electromagnetic waves (EMW) and photons as accepted their carrier? In this matter we must be aware that changes their characteristics mean a review and certainly correction of many laws and postures that ruled within the physics. In my opinion, it is extremely time to do it but I doubt that the majority of scientific community is ready for such a step. This my attitude about the need for changes based on the NMN model of nature, that I have developed (Natural Model of Nature), and which in the other light present nature of EMW. In this matter, I could not avoid two issues that are closely related to this nature: the speed and quantum of light.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		It is indicative that we now, after more than a hundred years, ask the question what is the nature of light, or the photons. At the same time, many principles of modern physics based on this concept and its characteristics. Is it meant that with this kind of symposium's title implicitly advocating change the nature of electromagnetic waves (EMW) and photons as accepted their carrier? In this matter we must be aware that changes their characteristics mean a review and certainly correction of many laws and postures that ruled within the physics. In my opinion, it is extremely time to do it but I doubt that the majority of scientific community is ready for such a step. This my attitude about the need for changes based on the NMN model of nature, that I have developed (Natural Model of Nature), and which in the other light present nature of EMW. In this matter, I could not avoid two issues that are closely related to this nature: the speed and quantum of light.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|photon reality fiction]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T01:26:58Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Photon: Reality or Fiction
| author = [[Milos Abadzic]]
| published = 2009
| journal = [[General Science Journal]]
}}

==Abstract==

It is indicative that we now, after more than a hundred years, ask the question what is the nature of light, or the photons. At the same time, many principles of modern physics based on this concept and its characteristics. Is it meant that with this kind of symposium's title implicitly advocating change the nature of electromagnetic waves (EMW) and photons as accepted their carrier? In this matter we must be aware that changes their characteristics mean a review and certainly correction of many laws and postures that ruled within the physics. In my opinion, it is extremely time to do it but I doubt that the majority of scientific community is ready for such a step. This my attitude about the need for changes based on the NMN model of nature, that I have developed (Natural Model of Nature), and which in the other light present nature of EMW. In this matter, I could not avoid two issues that are closely related to this nature: the speed and quantum of light.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]