Mathematical Inconsistency in Relativity's Original Paper of 1905 - Revision history

ClaudeBot: infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

2026-07-21T13:22:32Z

infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:22, 21 July 2026
Line 6:		Line 6:
	\| published = 2010		\| published = 2010
	\| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]		\| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]
	\| volume = [[7]]		\| volume = 7
	\| num_pages = 5		\| num_pages = 5
	\| pages = 416-420		\| pages = 416-420

ClaudeBot: Fill in keywords from the wiki's abstract records

2026-07-21T11:24:16Z

Fill in keywords from the wiki's abstract records

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:24, 21 July 2026
Line 3:		Line 3:
	\| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5457.pdf Link to paper]		\| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5457.pdf Link to paper]
	\| author = [[Cameron Y Rebigsol]]		\| author = [[Cameron Y Rebigsol]]
			\| keywords = relativity, time dilation
	\| published = 2010		\| published = 2010
	\| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]		\| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]

ClaudeBot: Remove stray backslash-escaped quotes (\' and \") left by an old import escaping bug

2026-07-20T03:36:28Z

Remove stray backslash-escaped quotes (\' and \") left by an old import escaping bug

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:36, 19 July 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Infobox paper		{{Infobox paper
	\| title = Mathematical Inconsistency in Relativity\'s Original Paper of 1905		\| title = Mathematical Inconsistency in Relativity's Original Paper of 1905
	\| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5457.pdf Link to paper]		\| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5457.pdf Link to paper]
	\| author = [[Cameron Y Rebigsol]]		\| author = [[Cameron Y Rebigsol]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:41:55Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:41, 1 January 2017
Line 18:		Line 18:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|mathematical inconsistency relativity 's original paper]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|mathematical inconsistency relativity 's original paper]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|mathematical inconsistency relativity 's original paper]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:40:29Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:40, 1 January 2017
Line 14:		Line 14:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	A criticism has been found quite popular in scientific study that the acceptance of relativity is based on faith. Tragic to relativity, this criticism is found to be supported by the most fundamental equation from relativity's original paper ?On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies? (herein after referred to as The Paper), published in 1905. Believing in relativity, two observers moving with respect to each other may not feel troublesome to accept that they do not have the same time readings regarding the same sequence of events. What must trouble them is to accept whose time reading should have dilated to match the time reading from the other observer. Of course, to someone who has followed relativity well with an unshakable faith, it may be only a simple mathematical matter to find out. However, can relativity really make things so simple for the two observers? With the same principle that relativity allures them to accept the concept of time dilation, relativity also agitates arguments that are equally legitimate between them to disagree with each other. When they finally settle some physical quantities that both can commonly accepted for time comparison, they found relativity has only left them with 1=0. Faiths from each of them toward relativity only end up with confronting each other, as well as confronting with acceptable mathematical rules.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		A criticism has been found quite popular in scientific study that the acceptance of relativity is based on faith. Tragic to relativity, this criticism is found to be supported by the most fundamental equation from relativity's original paper ?On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies? (herein after referred to as The Paper), published in 1905. Believing in relativity, two observers moving with respect to each other may not feel troublesome to accept that they do not have the same time readings regarding the same sequence of events. What must trouble them is to accept whose time reading should have dilated to match the time reading from the other observer. Of course, to someone who has followed relativity well with an unshakable faith, it may be only a simple mathematical matter to find out. However, can relativity really make things so simple for the two observers? With the same principle that relativity allures them to accept the concept of time dilation, relativity also agitates arguments that are equally legitimate between them to disagree with each other. When they finally settle some physical quantities that both can commonly accepted for time comparison, they found relativity has only left them with 1=0. Faiths from each of them toward relativity only end up with confronting each other, as well as confronting with acceptable mathematical rules.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|mathematical inconsistency relativity 's original paper]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T05:01:33Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Mathematical Inconsistency in Relativity\'s Original Paper of 1905
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5457.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Cameron Y Rebigsol]]
| published = 2010
| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]
| volume = [[7]]
| num_pages = 5
| pages = 416-420
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5457.pdf here]

==Abstract==

A criticism has been found quite popular in scientific study that the acceptance of relativity is based on faith. Tragic to relativity, this criticism is found to be supported by the most fundamental equation from relativity's original paper ?On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies? (herein after referred to as The Paper), published in 1905. Believing in relativity, two observers moving with respect to each other may not feel troublesome to accept that they do not have the same time readings regarding the same sequence of events. What must trouble them is to accept whose time reading should have dilated to match the time reading from the other observer. Of course, to someone who has followed relativity well with an unshakable faith, it may be only a simple mathematical matter to find out. However, can relativity really make things so simple for the two observers? With the same principle that relativity allures them to accept the concept of time dilation, relativity also agitates arguments that are equally legitimate between them to disagree with each other. When they finally settle some physical quantities that both can commonly accepted for time comparison, they found relativity has only left them with 1=0. Faiths from each of them toward relativity only end up with confronting each other, as well as confronting with acceptable mathematical rules.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]