Mössbauer Experiments in Rotating Systems Re-analyzed - Revision history

ClaudeBot: Fix mojibake in body text (per-word resolution)

2026-07-21T00:21:02Z

Fix mojibake in body text (per-word resolution)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:21, 20 July 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Infobox paper		{{Infobox paper
	\| title = ~~M?ssbauer~~ Experiments in Rotating Systems Re-analyzed		\| title = Mössbauer Experiments in Rotating Systems Re-analyzed
	\| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_1670.pdf Link to paper]		\| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_1670.pdf Link to paper]
	\| author = [[Alexander L Kholmetskii]], [[Tolga Yarman]]		\| author = [[Alexander L Kholmetskii]], [[Tolga Yarman]]
	\| keywords = [[~~M?ssbauer~~ Experiment]], [[Rotating Frame]]		\| keywords = [[Mössbauer Experiment]], [[Rotating Frame]]
	\| published = 2008		\| published = 2008
	\| num_pages = 6		\| num_pages = 6
Line 12:		Line 12:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	In this paper, we re-analyze the ingenious experiment by ~~K?ndig~~ (measurement of the transverse Doppler shift by means of the ~~M?ssbauer~~ effect) and show that a correct processing of experimental data gives a relative energy shift <em>DeltaE/E</em> of the absorption line different from the value of classically assumed relativistic time dilation for a rotating resonant absorber. Namely, instead of the relative energy shift <em>DeltaE/E</em> = −(1.0065?0.011)<em>v<sup>2</sup>/2c<sup>2</sup></em> reported by ~~K?ndig~~ (<em>v</em> being the linear velocity of absorber and <em>c</em> being the light velocity in vacuum), we derive from his results <em>DeltaE/E</em> = −(1.192?0.011)<em>v<sup>2</sup>/2c<sup>2</sup></em>. We are inclined to think that the revealed deviation of <em>DeltaE/E</em> from relativistic prediction cannot be explained by any instrumental error and thus represents a physical effect. In particular, we assume that the energy shift of the absorption resonant line is induced not only by the standard time dilation effect, but also by some additional effect missed at the moment, and related perhaps to the fact that resonant nuclei in the rotating absorber represent a macroscopic quantum system and cannot be considered as freely moving particles.</p>		In this paper, we re-analyze the ingenious experiment by Kündig (measurement of the transverse Doppler shift by means of the Mössbauer effect) and show that a correct processing of experimental data gives a relative energy shift <em>DeltaE/E</em> of the absorption line different from the value of classically assumed relativistic time dilation for a rotating resonant absorber. Namely, instead of the relative energy shift <em>DeltaE/E</em> = −(1.0065?0.011)<em>v<sup>2</sup>/2c<sup>2</sup></em> reported by Kündig (<em>v</em> being the linear velocity of absorber and <em>c</em> being the light velocity in vacuum), we derive from his results <em>DeltaE/E</em> = −(1.192?0.011)<em>v<sup>2</sup>/2c<sup>2</sup></em>. We are inclined to think that the revealed deviation of <em>DeltaE/E</em> from relativistic prediction cannot be explained by any instrumental error and thus represents a physical effect. In particular, we assume that the energy shift of the absorption resonant line is induced not only by the standard time dilation effect, but also by some additional effect missed at the moment, and related perhaps to the fact that resonant nuclei in the rotating absorber represent a macroscopic quantum system and cannot be considered as freely moving particles.</p>

	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|m ssbauer experiments rotating systems re-analyzed]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|m ssbauer experiments rotating systems re-analyzed]]

	[[Category:Relativity\|m ssbauer experiments rotating systems re-analyzed]]		[[Category:Relativity\|m ssbauer experiments rotating systems re-analyzed]]

ClaudeBot: ClaudeBot moved page M?ssbauer Experiments in Rotating Systems Re-analyzed to Mössbauer Experiments in Rotating Systems Re-analyzed: Fix mojibake: restore diacritics from explicit per-word resolution

2026-07-21T00:21:02Z

ClaudeBot moved page M?ssbauer Experiments in Rotating Systems Re-analyzed to Mössbauer Experiments in Rotating Systems Re-analyzed: Fix mojibake: restore diacritics from explicit per-word resolution

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:21, 20 July 2026
(No difference)

ClaudeBot: Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup)

2026-07-18T23:33:55Z

Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:33, 18 July 2026
Line 5:		Line 5:
	\| keywords = [[M?ssbauer Experiment]], [[Rotating Frame]]		\| keywords = [[M?ssbauer Experiment]], [[Rotating Frame]]
	\| published = 2008		\| published = 2008
	~~\| journal = [[None]]~~
	\| num_pages = 6		\| num_pages = 6
	}}		}}

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:43:37Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:43, 1 January 2017
Line 17:		Line 17:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|m ssbauer experiments rotating systems re-analyzed]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|m ssbauer experiments rotating systems re-analyzed]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|m ssbauer experiments rotating systems re-analyzed]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:43:32Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:43, 1 January 2017
Line 13:		Line 13:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	In this paper, we re-analyze the ingenious experiment by K?ndig (measurement of the transverse Doppler shift by means of the M?ssbauer effect) and show that a correct processing of experimental data gives a relative energy shift <em>DeltaE/E</em> of the absorption line different from the value of classically assumed relativistic time dilation for a rotating resonant absorber. Namely, instead of the relative energy shift <em>DeltaE/E</em> = −(1.0065?0.011)<em>v<sup>2</sup>/2c<sup>2</sup></em> reported by K?ndig (<em>v</em> being the linear velocity of absorber and <em>c</em> being the light velocity in vacuum), we derive from his results <em>DeltaE/E</em> = −(1.192?0.011)<em>v<sup>2</sup>/2c<sup>2</sup></em>. We are inclined to think that the revealed deviation of <em>DeltaE/E</em> from relativistic prediction cannot be explained by any instrumental error and thus represents a physical effect. In particular, we assume that the energy shift of the absorption resonant line is induced not only by the standard time dilation effect, but also by some additional effect missed at the moment, and related perhaps to the fact that resonant nuclei in the rotating absorber represent a macroscopic quantum system and cannot be considered as freely moving particles.</p>[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		In this paper, we re-analyze the ingenious experiment by K?ndig (measurement of the transverse Doppler shift by means of the M?ssbauer effect) and show that a correct processing of experimental data gives a relative energy shift <em>DeltaE/E</em> of the absorption line different from the value of classically assumed relativistic time dilation for a rotating resonant absorber. Namely, instead of the relative energy shift <em>DeltaE/E</em> = −(1.0065?0.011)<em>v<sup>2</sup>/2c<sup>2</sup></em> reported by K?ndig (<em>v</em> being the linear velocity of absorber and <em>c</em> being the light velocity in vacuum), we derive from his results <em>DeltaE/E</em> = −(1.192?0.011)<em>v<sup>2</sup>/2c<sup>2</sup></em>. We are inclined to think that the revealed deviation of <em>DeltaE/E</em> from relativistic prediction cannot be explained by any instrumental error and thus represents a physical effect. In particular, we assume that the energy shift of the absorption resonant line is induced not only by the standard time dilation effect, but also by some additional effect missed at the moment, and related perhaps to the fact that resonant nuclei in the rotating absorber represent a macroscopic quantum system and cannot be considered as freely moving particles.</p>

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|m ssbauer experiments rotating systems re-analyzed]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T16:28:25Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = M?ssbauer Experiments in Rotating Systems Re-analyzed
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_1670.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Alexander L Kholmetskii]], [[Tolga Yarman]]
| keywords = [[M?ssbauer Experiment]], [[Rotating Frame]]
| published = 2008
| journal = [[None]]
| num_pages = 6
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_1670.pdf here]

==Abstract==

In this paper, we re-analyze the ingenious experiment by K?ndig (measurement of the transverse Doppler shift by means of the M?ssbauer effect) and show that a correct processing of experimental data gives a relative energy shift DeltaE/E of the absorption line different from the value of classically assumed relativistic time dilation for a rotating resonant absorber. Namely, instead of the relative energy shift DeltaE/E = −(1.0065?0.011)v2/2c2 reported by K?ndig (v being the linear velocity of absorber and c being the light velocity in vacuum), we derive from his results DeltaE/E = −(1.192?0.011)v2/2c2. We are inclined to think that the revealed deviation of DeltaE/E from relativistic prediction cannot be explained by any instrumental error and thus represents a physical effect. In particular, we assume that the energy shift of the absorption resonant line is induced not only by the standard time dilation effect, but also by some additional effect missed at the moment, and related perhaps to the fact that resonant nuclei in the rotating absorber represent a macroscopic quantum system and cannot be considered as freely moving particles.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]