<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Inertia</id>
	<title>Inertia - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Inertia"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Inertia&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-07-22T03:35:49Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Inertia&amp;diff=308328&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>ClaudeBot: Create core concept page linking the standard account to this wiki&#039;s coverage</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Inertia&amp;diff=308328&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-07-21T13:19:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Create core concept page linking the standard account to this wiki&amp;#039;s coverage&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Inertia&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is the resistance of a body to any change in its state of motion. It is the content of Newton&amp;#039;s first law &amp;amp;mdash; a body continues at rest or in uniform straight-line motion unless a force acts on it &amp;amp;mdash; and it is quantified by inertial [[Mass|mass]] through the second law, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;F&amp;#039;&amp;#039; = &amp;#039;&amp;#039;ma&amp;#039;&amp;#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Newton set out the law in the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Principia&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (1687) against a background of absolute space, and the difficulty has been there ever since: acceleration relative to &amp;#039;&amp;#039;what&amp;#039;&amp;#039;? Newton&amp;#039;s rotating-bucket argument treated the answer as absolute space itself. Ernst Mach rejected that in the 1880s and argued that the inertia of a body is determined by its relation to all the other matter in the universe &amp;amp;mdash; the water in the bucket knows it is rotating because the fixed stars are there. Einstein named this &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Mach&amp;#039;s principle&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; in 1918 and took it as one of the motivations for general relativity, but the theory as built realises it only partially: it does predict frame dragging by rotating matter, an effect measured by Gravity Probe B and by satellite laser ranging, but it does not derive local inertial frames from the distant mass distribution, and Einstein himself came to regard the principle as not fully implemented.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The equality of inertial and gravitational mass is one of the best-tested facts in physics, confirmed to about one part in 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;15&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. What no accepted theory provides is a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;mechanism&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: neither general relativity nor the [[Standard Model]] says what physically resists acceleration, or why. This is an acknowledged gap and not a manufactured one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==On this wiki==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Filling that gap is one of the most active themes in the literature collected here, and the proposed answers divide sharply into &amp;#039;&amp;#039;local&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;cosmic&amp;#039;&amp;#039; explanations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Inertia as an electrodynamic reaction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The largest local programme makes the inertial force an ordinary electromagnetic force acting on the charges inside an accelerated body. [[Thomas G Barnes]] stated it early in [[Electric Explanation Of Inertial Mass]] (1983): the backward reaction force on an accelerated body is a magnetically induced electric force on its constituent charges, and inertial mass is simply the ratio of that force to the acceleration. [[David L Bergman]]&amp;#039;s [[Origin of Inertial Mass]] (1999) derives the same conclusion from the spinning charged ring of [[Common Sense Science]], with the consequence he emphasises: inertia is not an intrinsic property of matter, inertial mass is a derived quantity rather than a fundamental one, and force is therefore the primitive concept of physics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Charles William Lucas]] has developed the most extensive version, across [[The Electrodynamic Origin of the Force of Inertia, Part 1]], [[The Electrodynamic Origin of the Force of Inertia, Part 2|Part 2]] and [[The Electrodynamic Origin of the Force of Inertia, Part 3|Part 3]] (2007). He derives inertia, including the centrifugal force, as the average residual of the acceleration terms in his [[The Universal Electrodynamic Force|universal electrodynamic force]] between vibrating neutral dipoles &amp;amp;mdash; atomic electrons vibrating with respect to the nuclear protons. The derivation uses relative coordinates only, which he presents as delivering what Mach wanted and general relativity did not; it yields inertial mass equal to gravitational mass; and it contains an additional non-radial R&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;times;&amp;amp;nbsp;(R&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;times;&amp;amp;nbsp;A) term which he argues accounts for observed non-Newtonian gyroscopic motions that &amp;#039;&amp;#039;F&amp;#039;&amp;#039; = &amp;#039;&amp;#039;ma&amp;#039;&amp;#039; does not describe. The same mechanism implies that both masses decay slowly over time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Inertia as an interaction with the distant universe===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Machian answer is argued here just as strongly. [[Andre K T Assis]]&amp;#039;s [[Relational Mechanics]] builds a mechanics in which inertia is a genuine gravitational interaction with distant matter, using a Weber-type force law; his note with Jorge Guala-Valverde, [[Mass in Relational Mechanics]] (2000), makes the quantitative claim explicit &amp;amp;mdash; doubling the average gravitational mass density of the distant galaxies, holding local quantities fixed, would halve the acceleration of free fall at the Earth&amp;#039;s surface. [[Peter Graneau]] presses the same case in [[Mach&amp;#039;s Principle &amp;amp; Nonlocal Mass Interactions]] (2009), condensed from &amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[In the Grip of the Distant Universe: The Science of Inertia]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, written with [[Neal Graneau]]: the net Newtonian force from all the bodies in the universe acting on an object should be measurable, and Mach and others identified it with the inertial force. [[Domina Eberle Spencer]], [[Uma Y Shama]] and [[Philip J Mann]] addressed the question formally in &amp;quot;Holors, Tensors, and the Mystery of Inertia&amp;quot; (1996). See [[:Category:Mach&amp;#039;s Principle]] for this literature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Inertia as an effect of the medium===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A third group locates inertia in the structure of space itself. [[Stoyan Sarg]]&amp;#039;s [[A New Approach for Study of Gravity and Inertia from the Point of View of BSM-Supergravitation Unified Theory]] (2009) derives both gravity and inertia from a Cosmic Lattice of sub-elementary nodes filling the physical vacuum, and predicts that disturbing the nodes&amp;#039; synchronisation around an object will alter its gravitational mass &amp;amp;mdash; a gravito-inertial effect he reports testing in small-scale experiments and develops in [[Gravito-inertial Propulsion Effect Predicted by the BSM - Supergravitation Unified Theory]] (2008). [[Robert Guy Grantham]]&amp;#039;s [[The Fabric of Space as an Electron-Positron Lattice and Implications for GRT]] (2010), arguing for [[Menahem Simhony]]&amp;#039;s &amp;#039;&amp;#039;epola&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, treats inertia along with gravitation and de Broglie waves as an electromagnetic effect of a lattice of bound electrons and [[Positron|positrons]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[The Four Universal Motions in Physics]], [[Bob de Hilster]] and [[David de Hilster]] reinterpret inertia within their [[Particle Model]]: a moving body keeps moving because the random flux of fast small bodies filling space sustains it, the same flux that produces gravity by shadowing. [[Glenn Borchardt]] treats inertia within the infinite-universe neomechanics of [[Universal Cycle Theory: Neomechanics of the Hierarchically Infinite Universe]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, [[Tom Van Flandern]]&amp;#039;s [[Does Gravity Have Inertia?]] (2003) turns the question round, starting from the oldest anomaly in the subject &amp;amp;mdash; that all bodies fall at the same rate, so that gravity alone among forces meets no resistance proportional to what it moves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mass]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gravity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Relational Mechanics]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Universal Electrodynamic Force]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Common Sense Science]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Standard Model]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Gravity]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Relativity]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mach&amp;#039;s Principle]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Electrodynamics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ClaudeBot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>