How to Fix the Paradigm of Science - Revision history

ClaudeBot: infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

2026-07-21T13:17:20Z

infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:17, 21 July 2026
Line 6:		Line 6:
	\| published = 2010		\| published = 2010
	\| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]		\| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]
	\| volume = [[7]]		\| volume = 7
	\| num_pages = 4		\| num_pages = 4
	\| pages = 23-26		\| pages = 23-26

ClaudeBot: Add to Category:Light

2026-07-20T13:40:34Z

Add to Category:Light

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:40, 20 July 2026
Line 22:		Line 22:
	[[Category:Cosmology\|fix paradigm science]]		[[Category:Cosmology\|fix paradigm science]]
	[[Category:Structure\|fix paradigm science]]		[[Category:Structure\|fix paradigm science]]

			[[Category:Light]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:37:24Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:37, 1 January 2017
Line 19:		Line 19:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|fix paradigm science]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|fix paradigm science]]

	[[Category:Unified Theory]]		[[Category:Unified Theory\|fix paradigm science]]
	[[Category:Cosmology]]		[[Category:Cosmology\|fix paradigm science]]
	[[Category:Structure]]		[[Category:Structure\|fix paradigm science]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:32:13Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:32, 1 January 2017
Line 15:		Line 15:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	This paper and concomitant presentation begin with a brief discussion of the past, the present and the potential of the paradigm of science. Upfront are a few assumptions and definitions of such controversial terms as paradigm, science, faith and religion. Among the rhetorical questions posited and explored are - What exactly is wrong with the paradigm of science? What caused it? Who caused it? How was it caused and most importantly how to fix it if it is fixable at all? A prima facie case is made that it may be fixable, if at all and if and only if, erroneous knowledge is corrected or purged especially if it originated from such icons of science as Aristotle, Galileo, Newton, Darwin and Einstein. Other methods of fixing the paradigm include LCM (Lowest Common Multiple) and HCF (Highest Common Factor) of what is harmonious in knowledge pigeon-holed or even straight jacketed into compartments.Errors in both science and religion can be ameliorated if not obviated by application of empirical scientific methods to faith and religious concepts and best practices to science, which is further illustrated by a faith science ladder. The paramount impact and the nexus of the science paradigm is then discussed on a variety of dicta inter alia, Ockham's razor, irreducible complexity, simplicity of the universe and non-existent vestigial organs of the universe, if there be any for which the use has not yet been ascertained by the shifting science paradigm.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		This paper and concomitant presentation begin with a brief discussion of the past, the present and the potential of the paradigm of science. Upfront are a few assumptions and definitions of such controversial terms as paradigm, science, faith and religion. Among the rhetorical questions posited and explored are - What exactly is wrong with the paradigm of science? What caused it? Who caused it? How was it caused and most importantly how to fix it if it is fixable at all? A prima facie case is made that it may be fixable, if at all and if and only if, erroneous knowledge is corrected or purged especially if it originated from such icons of science as Aristotle, Galileo, Newton, Darwin and Einstein. Other methods of fixing the paradigm include LCM (Lowest Common Multiple) and HCF (Highest Common Factor) of what is harmonious in knowledge pigeon-holed or even straight jacketed into compartments.Errors in both science and religion can be ameliorated if not obviated by application of empirical scientific methods to faith and religious concepts and best practices to science, which is further illustrated by a faith science ladder. The paramount impact and the nexus of the science paradigm is then discussed on a variety of dicta inter alia, Ockham's razor, irreducible complexity, simplicity of the universe and non-existent vestigial organs of the universe, if there be any for which the use has not yet been ascertained by the shifting science paradigm.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|fix paradigm science]]

	[[Category:Unified Theory]]		[[Category:Unified Theory]]
	[[Category:Cosmology]]		[[Category:Cosmology]]
	[[Category:Structure]]		[[Category:Structure]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T01:19:26Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = How to Fix the Paradigm of Science
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5365.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Satya Pal Asija]]
| keywords = [[One]], [[Reality]], [[Science]], [[Paradigm]], [[Unified]], [[Theory]], [[Everything]], [[Assumptions]], [[Definitions]], [[Gravity]], [[Light]], [[Waves]], [[Ocham]], [[razor]], [[vestigial]], [[lowest]], [[common]], [[multiple]], [[highest]], [[factor]], [[LCM]], [[HCF]], [[Religion fa]]
| published = 2010
| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]
| volume = [[7]]
| num_pages = 4
| pages = 23-26
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5365.pdf here]

==Abstract==

This paper and concomitant presentation begin with a brief discussion of the past, the present and the potential of the paradigm of science. Upfront are a few assumptions and definitions of such controversial terms as paradigm, science, faith and religion. Among the rhetorical questions posited and explored are - What exactly is wrong with the paradigm of science? What caused it? Who caused it? How was it caused and most importantly how to fix it if it is fixable at all? A prima facie case is made that it may be fixable, if at all and if and only if, erroneous knowledge is corrected or purged especially if it originated from such icons of science as Aristotle, Galileo, Newton, Darwin and Einstein. Other methods of fixing the paradigm include LCM (Lowest Common Multiple) and HCF (Highest Common Factor) of what is harmonious in knowledge pigeon-holed or even straight jacketed into compartments.Errors in both science and religion can be ameliorated if not obviated by application of empirical scientific methods to faith and religious concepts and best practices to science, which is further illustrated by a faith science ladder. The paramount impact and the nexus of the science paradigm is then discussed on a variety of dicta inter alia, Ockham's razor, irreducible complexity, simplicity of the universe and non-existent vestigial organs of the universe, if there be any for which the use has not yet been ascertained by the shifting science paradigm.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Unified Theory]]
[[Category:Cosmology]]
[[Category:Structure]]