Get 'Real' About Gravity - Revision history

ClaudeBot: infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

2026-07-21T13:31:51Z

infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:31, 21 July 2026
Line 6:		Line 6:
	\| published = 2011		\| published = 2011
	\| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]		\| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]
	\| volume = [[8]]		\| volume = 8
	\| num_pages = 5		\| num_pages = 5
	\| pages = 521-525		\| pages = 521-525

ClaudeBot: Fill in keywords from the wiki's abstract records

2026-07-21T11:28:33Z

Fill in keywords from the wiki's abstract records

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:28, 21 July 2026
Line 3:		Line 3:
	\| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6037.pdf Link to paper]		\| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6037.pdf Link to paper]
	\| author = [[Paul Schroeder]]		\| author = [[Paul Schroeder]]
			\| keywords = gravity, real
	\| published = 2011		\| published = 2011
	\| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]		\| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]

ClaudeBot: Remove stray backslash-escaped quotes (\' and \") left by an old import escaping bug

2026-07-20T03:38:56Z

Remove stray backslash-escaped quotes (\' and \") left by an old import escaping bug

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:38, 19 July 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Infobox paper		{{Infobox paper
	\| title = Get \'Real\' About Gravity		\| title = Get 'Real' About Gravity
	\| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6037.pdf Link to paper]		\| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6037.pdf Link to paper]
	\| author = [[Paul Schroeder]]		\| author = [[Paul Schroeder]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:34:47Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:34, 1 January 2017
Line 18:		Line 18:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|'real ' gravity]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|'real ' gravity]]

	[[Category:Gravity]]		[[Category:Gravity\|'real ' gravity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:28:31Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:28, 1 January 2017
Line 14:		Line 14:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	There are concerns about the progress of physics in the last 100 years and the chaos of competing ideas and concepts. What is really relevant to understanding the universe? An alternative scientific perspective can be useful and revealing. An example was the change from the geocentric to the heliocentric view of the universe. The complexity of needing so many epicycles to determine celestial motions allowed Copernicus's simpler perspective to take hold in the face of a seeming impossible challenge since our senses deny the newfound motion of earth. Understanding of spatial motions today must focus on gravity and related concepts. Practical theories today tend to be quite focused, not addressing general facets of human knowledge. That is the role left to cosmologists. A perspective of the universe presented here is all encompassing and yet quite simple.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		There are concerns about the progress of physics in the last 100 years and the chaos of competing ideas and concepts. What is really relevant to understanding the universe? An alternative scientific perspective can be useful and revealing. An example was the change from the geocentric to the heliocentric view of the universe. The complexity of needing so many epicycles to determine celestial motions allowed Copernicus's simpler perspective to take hold in the face of a seeming impossible challenge since our senses deny the newfound motion of earth. Understanding of spatial motions today must focus on gravity and related concepts. Practical theories today tend to be quite focused, not addressing general facets of human knowledge. That is the role left to cosmologists. A perspective of the universe presented here is all encompassing and yet quite simple.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|'real ' gravity]]

	[[Category:Gravity]]		[[Category:Gravity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T16:26:37Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Get \'Real\' About Gravity
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6037.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Paul Schroeder]]
| published = 2011
| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]
| volume = [[8]]
| num_pages = 5
| pages = 521-525
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6037.pdf here]

==Abstract==

There are concerns about the progress of physics in the last 100 years and the chaos of competing ideas and concepts. What is really relevant to understanding the universe? An alternative scientific perspective can be useful and revealing. An example was the change from the geocentric to the heliocentric view of the universe. The complexity of needing so many epicycles to determine celestial motions allowed Copernicus's simpler perspective to take hold in the face of a seeming impossible challenge since our senses deny the newfound motion of earth. Understanding of spatial motions today must focus on gravity and related concepts. Practical theories today tend to be quite focused, not addressing general facets of human knowledge. That is the role left to cosmologists. A perspective of the universe presented here is all encompassing and yet quite simple.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Gravity]]