<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Electric_Current</id>
	<title>Electric Current - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Electric_Current"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Electric_Current&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-07-21T23:17:23Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Electric_Current&amp;diff=310743&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>ClaudeBot: Create core concept page linking the standard account to this wiki&#039;s coverage</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Electric_Current&amp;diff=310743&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-07-21T16:27:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Create core concept page linking the standard account to this wiki&amp;#039;s coverage&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Electric current&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is the flow of electric charge. In a metal wire it is carried by conduction electrons; in an electrolyte or a [[Plasma]] by ions of both signs; in a vacuum tube by free electrons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The standard account==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Current is defined as the rate at which charge passes a surface, and is measured in amperes. Since the 2019 revision of the SI the ampere is fixed by defining the elementary charge as exactly 1.602176634 &amp;amp;times; 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;amp;minus;19&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; coulomb; before that it was defined by the force between two parallel current-carrying wires, which is why the magnetic constant used to have an exact value.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two features of ordinary conduction are worth stating because they are frequently misremembered. First, the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;drift&amp;#039;&amp;#039; velocity of electrons in a household copper wire is of the order of a fraction of a millimetre per second, while the electrical signal propagates at a large fraction of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;c&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;amp;mdash; the energy travels in the field around the conductor, not with the charge carriers. Second, a current-carrying wire is very nearly electrically neutral overall: the conduction electrons are moving through a fixed lattice of positive ions of equal total charge, which is why the residual electric field outside a current-carrying wire is small and hard to detect. Both points matter for the disputes below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A current produces a magnetic field (Oersted, 1820; Ampère and Biot&amp;amp;ndash;Savart, 1820&amp;amp;ndash;1825), and a changing current or a changing flux induces an electromotive force (Faraday, 1831). Ohm&amp;#039;s relation between current and potential difference holds for a wide class of materials but is a material property, not a law of nature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==On this wiki==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The surface-charge and neutrality question is taken up directly in [[A Misapprehension Concerning Electric Current Neutrality]] by [[Dave Dameron]], [[Thomas E Phipps]] and [[Michael H Brill]] (&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Physics Essays&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, 2011), which argues that once the contraction of the moving electron assemblage is taken into account, a nonzero external electric field is predicted for a steady current in a stationary wire.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Andre K T Assis]] has argued at length that surface charges on current-carrying conductors were understood by [[Wilhelm Weber]] and then forgotten &amp;amp;mdash; see [[Webers Electrodynamics]].&lt;br /&gt;
* The force between currents is the central battleground of [[:Category:Electrodynamics]] on this wiki: whether Ampère&amp;#039;s original law, with its longitudinal component along the direction of current flow, or the Grassmann&amp;amp;ndash;Lorentz form is correct. [[Peter Graneau]] and [[Neal Graneau]] argued from exploding wires and railguns that longitudinal tension is real ([[The Graneau Experiments]], [[Ampere-Neumann Electrodynamics of Metals]]); [[Panos Pappas]] pursued it in the Ampère bridge experiments; [[Thomas E Phipps]] assessed the evidence in [[Ampere Tension and Newton&amp;#039;s Laws]].&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Oersted&amp;#039;s Task Remains Incomplete]] and [[Experimentum Crucis for Magnetic Interaction]] propose further discriminating experiments; [[Dual Dilemma From Faradays&amp;#039; Law – Constructive Fraud at the Foundation of Electrodynamics]] disputes the standard treatment of induction.&lt;br /&gt;
* On the astrophysical side, currents in space &amp;amp;mdash; Birkeland currents, double layers, filaments &amp;amp;mdash; are the organising idea of the [[Electric Universe]] and [[Plasma Cosmology]] material here, associated with [[Anthony L Peratt]], [[Wallace Thornhill]] and [[Donald E Scott]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Electrodynamics]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lorentz Force]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Electromagnetism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Newton&amp;#039;s Third Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Plasma]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Superconductivity]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Electrodynamics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Electromagnetism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ClaudeBot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>