Einstein's Theory Revised by Person(s) Unknown - Revision history

ClaudeBot: restore quotation marks lost to the encoding bug (paired conversions only; URLs, questions and German pages untouched)

2026-07-22T17:57:08Z

restore quotation marks lost to the encoding bug (paired conversions only; URLs, questions and German pages untouched)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:57, 22 July 2026
Line 15:		Line 15:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	Einstein's Special Relativity presents major problems to us because he failed to clearly state his theory, changed his mind numerous times, got his math in a mess, and so forth Not only that, his theory was revised by person or persons unknown. As will now be explained, that means ?we? cannot even know what his theory ?is? - i.e. not know what he intended his theory to be - and also not know what these unknown person(s) that revised the theory intended that theory to be. If the amended 1905 paper of Einstein's Special relativity were a legal document, it would be dismissed as bogus, because it would be impossible to know what the amendments mean. The foundation of modern physics is thus a far bigger hoax than the Piltdown man.		Einstein's Special Relativity presents major problems to us because he failed to clearly state his theory, changed his mind numerous times, got his math in a mess, and so forth Not only that, his theory was revised by person or persons unknown. As will now be explained, that means "we" cannot even know what his theory "is" - i.e. not know what he intended his theory to be - and also not know what these unknown person(s) that revised the theory intended that theory to be. If the amended 1905 paper of Einstein's Special relativity were a legal document, it would be dismissed as bogus, because it would be impossible to know what the amendments mean. The foundation of modern physics is thus a far bigger hoax than the Piltdown man.

	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|einstein 's theory revised person s unknown]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|einstein 's theory revised person s unknown]]

	[[Category:Relativity\|einstein 's theory revised person s unknown]]		[[Category:Relativity\|einstein 's theory revised person s unknown]]

ClaudeBot: infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

2026-07-21T13:33:26Z

infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:33, 21 July 2026
Line 6:		Line 6:
	\| published = 2011		\| published = 2011
	\| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]		\| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]
	\| volume = [[8]]		\| volume = 8
	\| num_pages = 2		\| num_pages = 2
	\| pages = 17-18		\| pages = 17-18

ClaudeBot: Fill in keywords from the wiki's abstract records

2026-07-21T11:29:28Z

Fill in keywords from the wiki's abstract records

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:29, 21 July 2026
Line 3:		Line 3:
	\| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6048.pdf Link to paper]		\| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6048.pdf Link to paper]
	\| author = [[Roger J Anderton]]		\| author = [[Roger J Anderton]]
			\| keywords = Einstein, Special Relativity
	\| published = 2011		\| published = 2011
	\| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]		\| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]

ClaudeBot: Remove stray backslash-escaped quotes (\' and \") left by an old import escaping bug

2026-07-20T03:39:31Z

Remove stray backslash-escaped quotes (\' and \") left by an old import escaping bug

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:39, 19 July 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Infobox paper		{{Infobox paper
	\| title = Einstein\'s Theory Revised by Person(s) Unknown		\| title = Einstein's Theory Revised by Person(s) Unknown
	\| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6048.pdf Link to paper]		\| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6048.pdf Link to paper]
	\| author = [[Roger J Anderton]]		\| author = [[Roger J Anderton]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:29:11Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:29, 1 January 2017
Line 18:		Line 18:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|einstein 's theory revised person s unknown]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|einstein 's theory revised person s unknown]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|einstein 's theory revised person s unknown]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:18:59Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:18, 1 January 2017
Line 14:		Line 14:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	Einstein's Special Relativity presents major problems to us because he failed to clearly state his theory, changed his mind numerous times, got his math in a mess, and so forth Not only that, his theory was revised by person or persons unknown. As will now be explained, that means ?we? cannot even know what his theory ?is? - i.e. not know what he intended his theory to be - and also not know what these unknown person(s) that revised the theory intended that theory to be. If the amended 1905 paper of Einstein's Special relativity were a legal document, it would be dismissed as bogus, because it would be impossible to know what the amendments mean. The foundation of modern physics is thus a far bigger hoax than the Piltdown man.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		Einstein's Special Relativity presents major problems to us because he failed to clearly state his theory, changed his mind numerous times, got his math in a mess, and so forth Not only that, his theory was revised by person or persons unknown. As will now be explained, that means ?we? cannot even know what his theory ?is? - i.e. not know what he intended his theory to be - and also not know what these unknown person(s) that revised the theory intended that theory to be. If the amended 1905 paper of Einstein's Special relativity were a legal document, it would be dismissed as bogus, because it would be impossible to know what the amendments mean. The foundation of modern physics is thus a far bigger hoax than the Piltdown man.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|einstein 's theory revised person s unknown]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T17:01:44Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Einstein\'s Theory Revised by Person(s) Unknown
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6048.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Roger J Anderton]]
| published = 2011
| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]
| volume = [[8]]
| num_pages = 2
| pages = 17-18
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_6048.pdf here]

==Abstract==

Einstein's Special Relativity presents major problems to us because he failed to clearly state his theory, changed his mind numerous times, got his math in a mess, and so forth Not only that, his theory was revised by person or persons unknown. As will now be explained, that means ?we? cannot even know what his theory ?is? - i.e. not know what he intended his theory to be - and also not know what these unknown person(s) that revised the theory intended that theory to be. If the amended 1905 paper of Einstein's Special relativity were a legal document, it would be dismissed as bogus, because it would be impossible to know what the amendments mean. The foundation of modern physics is thus a far bigger hoax than the Piltdown man.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]