ESJ Forum: The Shape of Light - Revision history

ClaudeBot: infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

2026-07-21T13:30:03Z

infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:30, 21 July 2026
Line 5:		Line 5:
	\| published = 1999		\| published = 1999
	\| journal = [[Electric Spacecraft Journal]]		\| journal = [[Electric Spacecraft Journal]]
	\| number = [[28]]		\| number = 28
	\| pages = 6-12		\| pages = 6-12
	}}		}}

ClaudeBot: Add to Category:Light

2026-07-20T13:40:54Z

Add to Category:Light

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:40, 20 July 2026
Line 16:		Line 16:

	[[Category:Relativity\|esj forum shape light]]		[[Category:Relativity\|esj forum shape light]]

			[[Category:Light]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:31:05Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:31, 1 January 2017
Line 15:		Line 15:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|esj forum shape light]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|esj forum shape light]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|esj forum shape light]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:22:28Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:22, 1 January 2017
Line 11:		Line 11:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	Light is enigmatic. Those who have seriously contemplated its fundamental nature are of a variety of opinions. In ESJ 27, Kulba suggested that light, arising from excitations and de-excitations of electrons, differed only in scale from radio waves emanating from a dipole antenna. It was further proposed that the aether was nothing more than the combination of all fields set up by the relative positions of all charges in the universe. Kulba shared these ideas with a handful of knowledgeable scientists, and the thought-provoking feedback they provided is the basis of this forum.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		Light is enigmatic. Those who have seriously contemplated its fundamental nature are of a variety of opinions. In ESJ 27, Kulba suggested that light, arising from excitations and de-excitations of electrons, differed only in scale from radio waves emanating from a dipole antenna. It was further proposed that the aether was nothing more than the combination of all fields set up by the relative positions of all charges in the universe. Kulba shared these ideas with a handful of knowledgeable scientists, and the thought-provoking feedback they provided is the basis of this forum.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|esj forum shape light]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T15:29:43Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = ESJ Forum: The Shape of Light
| author = [[Leslee A Kulba]]
| keywords = [[Hertzian waves]], [[electromagnetic radiation]], [[field theory]], [[light]], [[physical interpretation]]
| published = 1999
| journal = [[Electric Spacecraft Journal]]
| number = [[28]]
| pages = 6-12
}}

==Abstract==

Light is enigmatic. Those who have seriously contemplated its fundamental nature are of a variety of opinions. In ESJ 27, Kulba suggested that light, arising from excitations and de-excitations of electrons, differed only in scale from radio waves emanating from a dipole antenna. It was further proposed that the aether was nothing more than the combination of all fields set up by the relative positions of all charges in the universe. Kulba shared these ideas with a handful of knowledgeable scientists, and the thought-provoking feedback they provided is the basis of this forum.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]