Disputes Exist in Electromagnetic Induction - Revision history

ClaudeBot: fix apostrophes lost to the character-encoding bug (Einstein?s -> Einstein's); URLs left untouched

2026-07-22T13:03:21Z

fix apostrophes lost to the character-encoding bug (Einstein?s -> Einstein's); URLs left untouched

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:03, 22 July 2026
Line 3:		Line 3:
	\| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5914.pdf Link to paper]		\| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5914.pdf Link to paper]
	\| author = [[Qing Zeng]]		\| author = [[Qing Zeng]]
	\| keywords = [[Lorentz magnetic force]], [[Faraday?s low]], [[Lorentz? low]], [[Maxwell?s theory]]		\| keywords = [[Lorentz magnetic force]], [[Faraday's low]], [[Lorentz? low]], [[Maxwell's theory]]
	\| published = 2010		\| published = 2010
	\| num_pages = 7		\| num_pages = 7

ClaudeBot: Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup)

2026-07-18T23:32:34Z

Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:32, 18 July 2026
Line 5:		Line 5:
	\| keywords = [[Lorentz magnetic force]], [[Faraday?s low]], [[Lorentz? low]], [[Maxwell?s theory]]		\| keywords = [[Lorentz magnetic force]], [[Faraday?s low]], [[Lorentz? low]], [[Maxwell?s theory]]
	\| published = 2010		\| published = 2010
	~~\| journal = [[None]]~~
	\| num_pages = 7		\| num_pages = 7
	}}		}}

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:27:25Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:27, 1 January 2017
Line 17:		Line 17:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|disputes exist electromagnetic induction]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|disputes exist electromagnetic induction]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|disputes exist electromagnetic induction]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:16:08Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:16, 1 January 2017
Line 13:		Line 13:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	In 1832, Faraday assumed the induction between magnet and conductor produced the induced electromotive force (e.m.f.) in the conductor. In 1834, Lentz considered the induction produced the induced current in the conductor. The above are all induced matters with different causal relation. In 1865, Maxwell assumed during the magnet motion vortex electric-field (E-field) was produced around free space, which seemed to end the dispute of causal relation and yet it brought forward the question that the induction was produced in the conductor or in free space? In 1892, Lorentz created a metal electronic theory, for this reason the metal electron caused the induced current under Lorentz magnetic force, in which the nature is force instead of field. In essence, whether coil motion or magnet motion, as long as the relative movement remains between magnetic field and conductor, the metal electron will inevitably cut the magnetic line. The essence of electromagnetic induction could be consequently integrated with Lorentz magnetic force. In early twentieth century, relative electromagnetic theory arose that included electric field E and magnetic field B. So far, the unified theory on the electromagnetic induction nature has been not established. Which is nature, which is phenomenon? Which is reason? Which is result? Which is truth? Which is mistake? It is a great problem for all of us.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		In 1832, Faraday assumed the induction between magnet and conductor produced the induced electromotive force (e.m.f.) in the conductor. In 1834, Lentz considered the induction produced the induced current in the conductor. The above are all induced matters with different causal relation. In 1865, Maxwell assumed during the magnet motion vortex electric-field (E-field) was produced around free space, which seemed to end the dispute of causal relation and yet it brought forward the question that the induction was produced in the conductor or in free space? In 1892, Lorentz created a metal electronic theory, for this reason the metal electron caused the induced current under Lorentz magnetic force, in which the nature is force instead of field. In essence, whether coil motion or magnet motion, as long as the relative movement remains between magnetic field and conductor, the metal electron will inevitably cut the magnetic line. The essence of electromagnetic induction could be consequently integrated with Lorentz magnetic force. In early twentieth century, relative electromagnetic theory arose that included electric field E and magnetic field B. So far, the unified theory on the electromagnetic induction nature has been not established. Which is nature, which is phenomenon? Which is reason? Which is result? Which is truth? Which is mistake? It is a great problem for all of us.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|disputes exist electromagnetic induction]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T15:51:36Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Disputes Exist in Electromagnetic Induction
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5914.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Qing Zeng]]
| keywords = [[Lorentz magnetic force]], [[Faraday?s low]], [[Lorentz? low]], [[Maxwell?s theory]]
| published = 2010
| journal = [[None]]
| num_pages = 7
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5914.pdf here]

==Abstract==

In 1832, Faraday assumed the induction between magnet and conductor produced the induced electromotive force (e.m.f.) in the conductor. In 1834, Lentz considered the induction produced the induced current in the conductor. The above are all induced matters with different causal relation. In 1865, Maxwell assumed during the magnet motion vortex electric-field (E-field) was produced around free space, which seemed to end the dispute of causal relation and yet it brought forward the question that the induction was produced in the conductor or in free space? In 1892, Lorentz created a metal electronic theory, for this reason the metal electron caused the induced current under Lorentz magnetic force, in which the nature is force instead of field. In essence, whether coil motion or magnet motion, as long as the relative movement remains between magnetic field and conductor, the metal electron will inevitably cut the magnetic line. The essence of electromagnetic induction could be consequently integrated with Lorentz magnetic force. In early twentieth century, relative electromagnetic theory arose that included electric field E and magnetic field B. So far, the unified theory on the electromagnetic induction nature has been not established. Which is nature, which is phenomenon? Which is reason? Which is result? Which is truth? Which is mistake? It is a great problem for all of us.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]