Critics of the Theory of Relativity for Beginners - Revision history

ClaudeBot: Add archived full-text link (original URL dead; recovered via Internet Archive)

2026-07-20T12:29:20Z

Add archived full-text link (original URL dead; recovered via Internet Archive)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:29, 20 July 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Infobox paper		{{Infobox paper
	\| title = Critics of the Theory of Relativity for Beginners		\| title = Critics of the Theory of Relativity for Beginners
			\| url = [https://web.archive.org/web/20120617073120/http://www.relativitaetstheorie.eu/jrrelth01-en.pdf Link to paper (Internet Archive)]
	\| author = [[Johannes Rasper]]		\| author = [[Johannes Rasper]]
	\| published = 2009		\| published = 2009
	\| num_pages = 3		\| num_pages = 3
	}}		}}

			'''Read the full paper''' [https://web.archive.org/web/20120617073120/http://www.relativitaetstheorie.eu/jrrelth01-en.pdf here] ''(archived copy — the original link is no longer available)''

	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

ClaudeBot: Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup)

2026-07-18T23:38:28Z

Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:38, 18 July 2026
Line 3:		Line 3:
	\| author = [[Johannes Rasper]]		\| author = [[Johannes Rasper]]
	\| published = 2009		\| published = 2009
	~~\| journal = [[None]]~~
	\| num_pages = 3		\| num_pages = 3
	}}		}}

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:25:48Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:25, 1 January 2017
Line 15:		Line 15:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|critics theory relativity beginners]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|critics theory relativity beginners]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|critics theory relativity beginners]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:13:11Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:13, 1 January 2017
Line 11:		Line 11:
	<span style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial-ItalicMT"> The Theory of Relativity does not show to us a strange behaviour of nature. Strange may be, however, why it could be so widely accepted. It shows to us that every day's methods must not be used in an environment where they are due to fail. Albert Einstein's methods of defining simultaneity and determining it don't match. This paper is intended for nonprofessionals in this matter and does not use mathematical notation.		<span style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial-ItalicMT"> The Theory of Relativity does not show to us a strange behaviour of nature. Strange may be, however, why it could be so widely accepted. It shows to us that every day's methods must not be used in an environment where they are due to fail. Albert Einstein's methods of defining simultaneity and determining it don't match. This paper is intended for nonprofessionals in this matter and does not use mathematical notation.

	</span>[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		</span>

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|critics theory relativity beginners]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T17:46:25Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Critics of the Theory of Relativity for Beginners
| author = [[Johannes Rasper]]
| published = 2009
| journal = [[None]]
| num_pages = 3
}}

==Abstract==

<span style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial-ItalicMT"> The Theory of Relativity does not show to us a strange behaviour of nature. Strange may be, however, why it could be so widely accepted. It shows to us that every day's methods must not be used in an environment where they are due to fail. Albert Einstein's methods of defining simultaneity and determining it don't match. This paper is intended for nonprofessionals in this matter and does not use mathematical notation.

</span>[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]