Criticism of Some Aspects of the Relativity Theory - Revision history

ClaudeBot: Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup)

2026-07-18T23:30:41Z

Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:30, 18 July 2026
Line 5:		Line 5:
	\| keywords = [[relativity]]		\| keywords = [[relativity]]
	\| published = 2006		\| published = 2006
	~~\| journal = [[None]]~~
	\| num_pages = 5		\| num_pages = 5
	\| pages = 7-17		\| pages = 7-17

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:25:46Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:25, 1 January 2017
Line 18:		Line 18:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|criticism aspects relativity theory]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|criticism aspects relativity theory]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|criticism aspects relativity theory]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:13:08Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:13, 1 January 2017
Line 16:		Line 16:
	The report is devoted to the critical analysis of some aspects of the relativity theory (see http://www.antidogma.ru ). RT appears inconsistent for more than two objects or for a three-dimensional movement even for two objects moving on crossed straight lines. The relativistic equation of charge movement with the Lorentz force can simply be reduced to Newton's second law. There are neither physical nor mathematical bases to claim, as if Lorentz transformations (received for emptiness) determine all properties in the Universe. Even the analysis of invariance of Maxwell equations shows, that the hypothesis about application of Lorentz transformations to all the physical phenomena is groundless. The analysis of modern electrodynamics also shows that it cannot be considered as principally strict theory (but only as approximate one).		The report is devoted to the critical analysis of some aspects of the relativity theory (see http://www.antidogma.ru ). RT appears inconsistent for more than two objects or for a three-dimensional movement even for two objects moving on crossed straight lines. The relativistic equation of charge movement with the Lorentz force can simply be reduced to Newton's second law. There are neither physical nor mathematical bases to claim, as if Lorentz transformations (received for emptiness) determine all properties in the Universe. Even the analysis of invariance of Maxwell equations shows, that the hypothesis about application of Lorentz transformations to all the physical phenomena is groundless. The analysis of modern electrodynamics also shows that it cannot be considered as principally strict theory (but only as approximate one).

	[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|criticism aspects relativity theory]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T05:52:53Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Criticism of Some Aspects of the Relativity Theory
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_2329.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Sergey N Arteha]]
| keywords = [[relativity]]
| published = 2006
| journal = [[None]]
| num_pages = 5
| pages = 7-17
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_2329.pdf here]

==Abstract==

The report is devoted to the critical analysis of some aspects of the relativity theory (see http://www.antidogma.ru ). RT appears inconsistent for more than two objects or for a three-dimensional movement even for two objects moving on crossed straight lines. The relativistic equation of charge movement with the Lorentz force can simply be reduced to Newton's second law. There are neither physical nor mathematical bases to claim, as if Lorentz transformations (received for emptiness) determine all properties in the Universe. Even the analysis of invariance of Maxwell equations shows, that the hypothesis about application of Lorentz transformations to all the physical phenomena is groundless. The analysis of modern electrodynamics also shows that it cannot be considered as principally strict theory (but only as approximate one).

[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]