Consequences of Relativity's Failure To Control Assumptions - Revision history

ClaudeBot: infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

2026-07-21T13:18:55Z

infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:18, 21 July 2026
Line 5:		Line 5:
	\| published = 2005		\| published = 2005
	\| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]		\| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]
	\| volume = [[2]]		\| volume = 2
	\| pages = 112-117		\| pages = 112-117
	}}		}}

ClaudeBot: Fix mojibake in body text (apostrophe / Ampère)

2026-07-21T00:16:34Z

Fix mojibake in body text (apostrophe / Ampère)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:16, 20 July 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Infobox paper		{{Infobox paper
	\| title = Consequences of Relativity?s Failure To Control Assumptions		\| title = Consequences of Relativity's Failure To Control Assumptions
	\| author = [[Neil E Munch]]		\| author = [[Neil E Munch]]
	\| keywords = [[light wave equations]], [[special relativity]], [[Lorentz transformation]]		\| keywords = [[light wave equations]], [[special relativity]], [[Lorentz transformation]]
Line 11:		Line 11:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	Like an Escher print with its contradictory viewing assumptions, relativity and related cosmology theories are also flawed by use of contradictory assumptions. For example, the light wave equations were an assumed basis of special relativity (SRT) equations. So, the time terms in SRT must be the elapsed time of light travel along the length term regardless of its direction, not clock time or clock rates or the age of twins as often assumed. Consequently, its Lorentz transformation (E-LT) is critically flawed. When light passes to and fro over a moving length, the universality of its derivation assumptions requires that length to both contract and dilate at the same instant. That?s impossible. SRT?s erroneous shift to focus on clocks and their simultaneity has side-tracked progress in modern physics for decades. Zero rest mass of a photon, assumed to avoid SRT?s requirement for infinite mass at light speed <em>c</em>, is contradicted by the finite rest mass of photons in Bose-Einstein condensate experiments. The presumption by SRT that objects cannot exceed speed <em>c</em> can be rejected by the above flaws and because super-luminal speed luminosities are frequently observed in astronomy. Yet, the myth remains that an object?s speed is limited to <em>c</em>. It?s quite clear that Minkowski?s space-time concepts contradict E-LT basis in light wave equations, if one only looks. Space-time is easily rejected yet it remains as truth in text books. SRT basis on constant velocity and constant <em>c</em> constrain its use to rectilinear motion. Yet, SRT and its erroneous space-time concepts formed the basis of general relativity (GRT) and the subsequent Big Bang concepts. Both have questionable validity. All such contradictory assumptions and their consequences could have been avoided by good assumptions control.		Like an Escher print with its contradictory viewing assumptions, relativity and related cosmology theories are also flawed by use of contradictory assumptions. For example, the light wave equations were an assumed basis of special relativity (SRT) equations. So, the time terms in SRT must be the elapsed time of light travel along the length term regardless of its direction, not clock time or clock rates or the age of twins as often assumed. Consequently, its Lorentz transformation (E-LT) is critically flawed. When light passes to and fro over a moving length, the universality of its derivation assumptions requires that length to both contract and dilate at the same instant. That's impossible. SRT's erroneous shift to focus on clocks and their simultaneity has side-tracked progress in modern physics for decades. Zero rest mass of a photon, assumed to avoid SRT's requirement for infinite mass at light speed <em>c</em>, is contradicted by the finite rest mass of photons in Bose-Einstein condensate experiments. The presumption by SRT that objects cannot exceed speed <em>c</em> can be rejected by the above flaws and because super-luminal speed luminosities are frequently observed in astronomy. Yet, the myth remains that an object's speed is limited to <em>c</em>. It's quite clear that Minkowski's space-time concepts contradict E-LT basis in light wave equations, if one only looks. Space-time is easily rejected yet it remains as truth in text books. SRT basis on constant velocity and constant <em>c</em> constrain its use to rectilinear motion. Yet, SRT and its erroneous space-time concepts formed the basis of general relativity (GRT) and the subsequent Big Bang concepts. Both have questionable validity. All such contradictory assumptions and their consequences could have been avoided by good assumptions control.

	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|consequences relativity s failure control assumptions]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|consequences relativity s failure control assumptions]]

	[[Category:Relativity\|consequences relativity s failure control assumptions]]		[[Category:Relativity\|consequences relativity s failure control assumptions]]

ClaudeBot: ClaudeBot moved page Consequences of Relativity?s Failure To Control Assumptions to Consequences of Relativity's Failure To Control Assumptions: Fix mojibake: restore apostrophe / Ampère (unambiguous rules only)

2026-07-21T00:16:33Z

ClaudeBot moved page Consequences of Relativity?s Failure To Control Assumptions to Consequences of Relativity's Failure To Control Assumptions: Fix mojibake: restore apostrophe / Ampère (unambiguous rules only)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:16, 20 July 2026
(No difference)

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:24:42Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:24, 1 January 2017
Line 15:		Line 15:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|consequences relativity s failure control assumptions]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|consequences relativity s failure control assumptions]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|consequences relativity s failure control assumptions]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:11:02Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:11, 1 January 2017
Line 11:		Line 11:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	Like an Escher print with its contradictory viewing assumptions, relativity and related cosmology theories are also flawed by use of contradictory assumptions. For example, the light wave equations were an assumed basis of special relativity (SRT) equations. So, the time terms in SRT must be the elapsed time of light travel along the length term regardless of its direction, not clock time or clock rates or the age of twins as often assumed. Consequently, its Lorentz transformation (E-LT) is critically flawed. When light passes to and fro over a moving length, the universality of its derivation assumptions requires that length to both contract and dilate at the same instant. That?s impossible. SRT?s erroneous shift to focus on clocks and their simultaneity has side-tracked progress in modern physics for decades. Zero rest mass of a photon, assumed to avoid SRT?s requirement for infinite mass at light speed <em>c</em>, is contradicted by the finite rest mass of photons in Bose-Einstein condensate experiments. The presumption by SRT that objects cannot exceed speed <em>c</em> can be rejected by the above flaws and because super-luminal speed luminosities are frequently observed in astronomy. Yet, the myth remains that an object?s speed is limited to <em>c</em>. It?s quite clear that Minkowski?s space-time concepts contradict E-LT basis in light wave equations, if one only looks. Space-time is easily rejected yet it remains as truth in text books. SRT basis on constant velocity and constant <em>c</em> constrain its use to rectilinear motion. Yet, SRT and its erroneous space-time concepts formed the basis of general relativity (GRT) and the subsequent Big Bang concepts. Both have questionable validity. All such contradictory assumptions and their consequences could have been avoided by good assumptions control.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		Like an Escher print with its contradictory viewing assumptions, relativity and related cosmology theories are also flawed by use of contradictory assumptions. For example, the light wave equations were an assumed basis of special relativity (SRT) equations. So, the time terms in SRT must be the elapsed time of light travel along the length term regardless of its direction, not clock time or clock rates or the age of twins as often assumed. Consequently, its Lorentz transformation (E-LT) is critically flawed. When light passes to and fro over a moving length, the universality of its derivation assumptions requires that length to both contract and dilate at the same instant. That?s impossible. SRT?s erroneous shift to focus on clocks and their simultaneity has side-tracked progress in modern physics for decades. Zero rest mass of a photon, assumed to avoid SRT?s requirement for infinite mass at light speed <em>c</em>, is contradicted by the finite rest mass of photons in Bose-Einstein condensate experiments. The presumption by SRT that objects cannot exceed speed <em>c</em> can be rejected by the above flaws and because super-luminal speed luminosities are frequently observed in astronomy. Yet, the myth remains that an object?s speed is limited to <em>c</em>. It?s quite clear that Minkowski?s space-time concepts contradict E-LT basis in light wave equations, if one only looks. Space-time is easily rejected yet it remains as truth in text books. SRT basis on constant velocity and constant <em>c</em> constrain its use to rectilinear motion. Yet, SRT and its erroneous space-time concepts formed the basis of general relativity (GRT) and the subsequent Big Bang concepts. Both have questionable validity. All such contradictory assumptions and their consequences could have been avoided by good assumptions control.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|consequences relativity s failure control assumptions]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T02:22:51Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Consequences of Relativity?s Failure To Control Assumptions
| author = [[Neil E Munch]]
| keywords = [[light wave equations]], [[special relativity]], [[Lorentz transformation]]
| published = 2005
| journal = [[Proceedings of the NPA]]
| volume = [[2]]
| pages = 112-117
}}

==Abstract==

Like an Escher print with its contradictory viewing assumptions, relativity and related cosmology theories are also flawed by use of contradictory assumptions. For example, the light wave equations were an assumed basis of special relativity (SRT) equations. So, the time terms in SRT must be the elapsed time of light travel along the length term regardless of its direction, not clock time or clock rates or the age of twins as often assumed. Consequently, its Lorentz transformation (E-LT) is critically flawed. When light passes to and fro over a moving length, the universality of its derivation assumptions requires that length to both contract and dilate at the same instant. That?s impossible. SRT?s erroneous shift to focus on clocks and their simultaneity has side-tracked progress in modern physics for decades. Zero rest mass of a photon, assumed to avoid SRT?s requirement for infinite mass at light speed c, is contradicted by the finite rest mass of photons in Bose-Einstein condensate experiments. The presumption by SRT that objects cannot exceed speed c can be rejected by the above flaws and because super-luminal speed luminosities are frequently observed in astronomy. Yet, the myth remains that an object?s speed is limited to c. It?s quite clear that Minkowski?s space-time concepts contradict E-LT basis in light wave equations, if one only looks. Space-time is easily rejected yet it remains as truth in text books. SRT basis on constant velocity and constant c constrain its use to rectilinear motion. Yet, SRT and its erroneous space-time concepts formed the basis of general relativity (GRT) and the subsequent Big Bang concepts. Both have questionable validity. All such contradictory assumptions and their consequences could have been avoided by good assumptions control.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]