Conflict of Atomism and Creation-Science in History - Revision history

ClaudeBot: infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

2026-07-21T13:23:49Z

infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:23, 21 July 2026
Line 6:		Line 6:
	\| published = 2011		\| published = 2011
	\| journal = [[Foundations of Science]]		\| journal = [[Foundations of Science]]
	\| volume = [[14]]		\| volume = 14
	\| number = [[4]]		\| number = 4
	\| num_pages = 21		\| num_pages = 21
	}}		}}

ClaudeBot: Fill in keywords from the wiki's abstract records

2026-07-21T11:24:53Z

Fill in keywords from the wiki's abstract records

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:24, 21 July 2026
Line 3:		Line 3:
	\| url = [https://web.archive.org/web/20120412211001/http://www.commonsensescience.org/pdf/articles/conflict_of_atomism_and_creation_science_in_history_fos_v14n4.pdf Link to paper (Internet Archive)]		\| url = [https://web.archive.org/web/20120412211001/http://www.commonsensescience.org/pdf/articles/conflict_of_atomism_and_creation_science_in_history_fos_v14n4.pdf Link to paper (Internet Archive)]
	\| author = [[David L Bergman]]		\| author = [[David L Bergman]]
			\| keywords = creation, elementary particles, Assumptions, forces
	\| published = 2011		\| published = 2011
	\| journal = [[Foundations of Science]]		\| journal = [[Foundations of Science]]

ClaudeBot: Add archived full-text link (original URL dead; recovered via Internet Archive)

2026-07-20T12:28:06Z

Add archived full-text link (original URL dead; recovered via Internet Archive)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:28, 20 July 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Infobox paper		{{Infobox paper
	\| title = Conflict of Atomism and Creation-Science in History		\| title = Conflict of Atomism and Creation-Science in History
			\| url = [https://web.archive.org/web/20120412211001/http://www.commonsensescience.org/pdf/articles/conflict_of_atomism_and_creation_science_in_history_fos_v14n4.pdf Link to paper (Internet Archive)]
	\| author = [[David L Bergman]]		\| author = [[David L Bergman]]
	\| published = 2011		\| published = 2011
Line 8:		Line 9:
	\| num_pages = 21		\| num_pages = 21
	}}		}}

			'''Read the full paper''' [https://web.archive.org/web/20120412211001/http://www.commonsensescience.org/pdf/articles/conflict_of_atomism_and_creation_science_in_history_fos_v14n4.pdf here] ''(archived copy — the original link is no longer available)''

	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:10:48Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:10, 1 January 2017
Line 11:		Line 11:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	The underlying worldview assumptions of creation-science are centered in reality, causality and unity?logical assumptions that became embedded in classical science and the Scientific Method. Creation-science has been opposed by atomism ever since Epicurus asserted that random events occur in matter. This randomized theory of matter developed by early atomists to support their pantheistic worldview persists in modern science where atomistic assumptions are implemented into current theories of matter, forces and cosmology. Recently, some creationists have returned to the logical basis of science and developed physical models of elementary particles and atoms to form an improved basic theory of matter. Numerous examples show how creationtist worldview assumptions lead to superior explanations of the structure of matter and the nature of forces on objects.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		The underlying worldview assumptions of creation-science are centered in reality, causality and unity?logical assumptions that became embedded in classical science and the Scientific Method. Creation-science has been opposed by atomism ever since Epicurus asserted that random events occur in matter. This randomized theory of matter developed by early atomists to support their pantheistic worldview persists in modern science where atomistic assumptions are implemented into current theories of matter, forces and cosmology. Recently, some creationists have returned to the logical basis of science and developed physical models of elementary particles and atoms to form an improved basic theory of matter. Numerous examples show how creationtist worldview assumptions lead to superior explanations of the structure of matter and the nature of forces on objects.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|conflict atomism creation-science history]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T05:09:25Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Conflict of Atomism and Creation-Science in History
| author = [[David L Bergman]]
| published = 2011
| journal = [[Foundations of Science]]
| volume = [[14]]
| number = [[4]]
| num_pages = 21
}}

==Abstract==

The underlying worldview assumptions of creation-science are centered in reality, causality and unity?logical assumptions that became embedded in classical science and the Scientific Method. Creation-science has been opposed by atomism ever since Epicurus asserted that random events occur in matter. This randomized theory of matter developed by early atomists to support their pantheistic worldview persists in modern science where atomistic assumptions are implemented into current theories of matter, forces and cosmology. Recently, some creationists have returned to the logical basis of science and developed physical models of elementary particles and atoms to form an improved basic theory of matter. Numerous examples show how creationtist worldview assumptions lead to superior explanations of the structure of matter and the nature of forces on objects.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]