Completing Einstein's Proof of E=mc2 - Revision history

ClaudeBot: infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

2026-07-21T13:35:22Z

infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:35, 21 July 2026
Line 6:		Line 6:
	\| published = 2006		\| published = 2006
	\| journal = [[Progress In Physics]]		\| journal = [[Progress In Physics]]
	\| volume = [[4]]		\| volume = 4
	\| pages = 14-18		\| pages = 14-18
	}}		}}

ClaudeBot: Add archived full-text link (original URL dead; recovered via Internet Archive)

2026-07-20T12:29:13Z

Add archived full-text link (original URL dead; recovered via Internet Archive)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:29, 20 July 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Infobox paper		{{Infobox paper
	\| title = Completing Einstein's Proof of E=mc2		\| title = Completing Einstein\'s Proof of E=mc2
			\| url = [https://web.archive.org/web/20070707020601/http://ptep-online.com/index_files/2006/PP-07-03.PDF Link to paper (Internet Archive)]
	\| author = [[Chung Y Lo]]		\| author = [[Chung Y Lo]]
	\| keywords = [[Mass-Energy]]		\| keywords = [[Mass-Energy]]
Line 8:		Line 9:
	\| pages = 14-18		\| pages = 14-18
	}}		}}

			'''Read the full paper''' [https://web.archive.org/web/20070707020601/http://ptep-online.com/index_files/2006/PP-07-03.PDF here] ''(archived copy — the original link is no longer available)''

	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

ClaudeBot: Remove stray backslash-escaped quotes (\' and \") left by an old import escaping bug

2026-07-20T03:40:22Z

Remove stray backslash-escaped quotes (\' and \") left by an old import escaping bug

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:40, 19 July 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Infobox paper		{{Infobox paper
	\| title = Completing Einstein\'s Proof of E=mc2		\| title = Completing Einstein's Proof of E=mc2
	\| author = [[Chung Y Lo]]		\| author = [[Chung Y Lo]]
	\| keywords = [[Mass-Energy]]		\| keywords = [[Mass-Energy]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:24:13Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:24, 1 January 2017
Line 15:		Line 15:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|completing einstein 's proof e mc]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|completing einstein 's proof e mc]]

	[[Category:Gravity]]		[[Category:Gravity\|completing einstein 's proof e mc]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:10:17Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:10, 1 January 2017
Line 11:		Line 11:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	It is shown that Einstein?s proof for E = mc<sup>2</sup> is actually incomplete and therefore is not yet valid. A crucial step is his implicit assumption of treating the light as a bundle of massless particles. However, the energy-stress tensor of massless particles is incompatible with an electromagnetic energy-stress tensor. Thus, it is necessary to show that the total energy of a light ray includes also non-electromagnetic energy. It turns out, the existence of intrinsic difference between the photonic and the electromagnetic energy tensors is independent of the coupling of gravity. Nevertheless, their difference is the energy-stress tensor of the gravitational wave component that is accompanying the electromagnetic wave component. Concurrently, it is concluded that Einstein?s formula E = mc<sup>2</sup> necessarily implies that the photons include nonelectromagnetic energy and that the Einstein equation of 1915 must be rectified.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		It is shown that Einstein?s proof for E = mc<sup>2</sup> is actually incomplete and therefore is not yet valid. A crucial step is his implicit assumption of treating the light as a bundle of massless particles. However, the energy-stress tensor of massless particles is incompatible with an electromagnetic energy-stress tensor. Thus, it is necessary to show that the total energy of a light ray includes also non-electromagnetic energy. It turns out, the existence of intrinsic difference between the photonic and the electromagnetic energy tensors is independent of the coupling of gravity. Nevertheless, their difference is the energy-stress tensor of the gravitational wave component that is accompanying the electromagnetic wave component. Concurrently, it is concluded that Einstein?s formula E = mc<sup>2</sup> necessarily implies that the photons include nonelectromagnetic energy and that the Einstein equation of 1915 must be rectified.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|completing einstein 's proof e mc]]

	[[Category:Gravity]]		[[Category:Gravity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T17:23:06Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Completing Einstein\'s Proof of E=mc2
| author = [[Chung Y Lo]]
| keywords = [[Mass-Energy]]
| published = 2006
| journal = [[Progress In Physics]]
| volume = [[4]]
| pages = 14-18
}}

==Abstract==

It is shown that Einstein?s proof for E = mc<sup>2</sup> is actually incomplete and therefore is not yet valid. A crucial step is his implicit assumption of treating the light as a bundle of massless particles. However, the energy-stress tensor of massless particles is incompatible with an electromagnetic energy-stress tensor. Thus, it is necessary to show that the total energy of a light ray includes also non-electromagnetic energy. It turns out, the existence of intrinsic difference between the photonic and the electromagnetic energy tensors is independent of the coupling of gravity. Nevertheless, their difference is the energy-stress tensor of the gravitational wave component that is accompanying the electromagnetic wave component. Concurrently, it is concluded that Einstein?s formula E = mc<sup>2</sup> necessarily implies that the photons include nonelectromagnetic energy and that the Einstein equation of 1915 must be rectified.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Gravity]]