Comments on Montgomery's Paper on Electrodynamics - Revision history

ClaudeBot: infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

2026-07-21T13:29:54Z

infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:29, 21 July 2026
Line 6:		Line 6:
	\| published = 2004		\| published = 2004
	\| journal = [[Apeiron]]		\| journal = [[Apeiron]]
	\| volume = [[11]]		\| volume = 11
	\| number = [[2]]		\| number = 2
	\| num_pages = 3		\| num_pages = 3
	\| pages = 327-329		\| pages = 327-329

ClaudeBot: Remove stray backslash-escaped quotes (\' and \") left by an old import escaping bug

2026-07-20T03:38:32Z

Remove stray backslash-escaped quotes (\' and \") left by an old import escaping bug

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:38, 19 July 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Infobox paper		{{Infobox paper
	\| title = Comments on Montgomery\'s Paper on Electrodynamics		\| title = Comments on Montgomery's Paper on Electrodynamics
	\| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_665.pdf Link to paper]		\| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_665.pdf Link to paper]
	\| author = [[Jorge A Guala-Valverde]]		\| author = [[Jorge A Guala-Valverde]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:24:05Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:24, 1 January 2017
Line 20:		Line 20:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|comments montgomery 's paper electrodynamics]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|comments montgomery 's paper electrodynamics]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|comments montgomery 's paper electrodynamics]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:09:57Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:09, 1 January 2017
Line 18:		Line 18:
	Hence the production of an induced current requires a relative motion of the disk and the external circuit, and not as one might expect a relative motion of the disk and the magnet," H. Montgomery wrote recently in the European Journal of Physics, adding, on page 180: "According to this argument there seems to be no justification for shifting the "seat" of the EMF to the external circuit when one considers Faraday's second experiment." The first sentence above "true but physically "colourless" and the second deserve thorough consideration in light of recent experimental search advanced in Apeiron and widely published subsequently. In fact, since 2001 we have known that a spinning magnet induces a Lorentz-type electric field responsible for a motional Hall effect in the bulk of nearby conductors (Figure 1).		Hence the production of an induced current requires a relative motion of the disk and the external circuit, and not as one might expect a relative motion of the disk and the magnet," H. Montgomery wrote recently in the European Journal of Physics, adding, on page 180: "According to this argument there seems to be no justification for shifting the "seat" of the EMF to the external circuit when one considers Faraday's second experiment." The first sentence above "true but physically "colourless" and the second deserve thorough consideration in light of recent experimental search advanced in Apeiron and widely published subsequently. In fact, since 2001 we have known that a spinning magnet induces a Lorentz-type electric field responsible for a motional Hall effect in the bulk of nearby conductors (Figure 1).

	[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|comments montgomery 's paper electrodynamics]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T15:29:02Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Comments on Montgomery\'s Paper on Electrodynamics
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_665.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Jorge A Guala-Valverde]]
| keywords = [[spinning magnet]], [[Lorentz-type electric field]], [[Hall effect]]
| published = 2004
| journal = [[Apeiron]]
| volume = [[11]]
| number = [[2]]
| num_pages = 3
| pages = 327-329
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_665.pdf here]

==Abstract==

Hence the production of an induced current requires a relative motion of the disk and the external circuit, and not as one might expect a relative motion of the disk and the magnet," H. Montgomery wrote recently in the European Journal of Physics, adding, on page 180: "According to this argument there seems to be no justification for shifting the "seat" of the EMF to the external circuit when one considers Faraday's second experiment." The first sentence above "true but physically "colourless" and the second deserve thorough consideration in light of recent experimental search advanced in Apeiron and widely published subsequently. In fact, since 2001 we have known that a spinning magnet induces a Lorentz-type electric field responsible for a motional Hall effect in the bulk of nearby conductors (Figure 1).

[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]