Coming Full Circle With Quantum Hall Explanations - Revision history

ClaudeBot: restore accented characters lost to the encoding bug (verified names/words only; URLs untouched)

2026-07-22T13:17:25Z

restore accented characters lost to the encoding bug (verified names/words only; URLs untouched)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:17, 22 July 2026
Line 11:		Line 11:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	The vast majority of attempts at describing how the two quantum Hall effects fit existing theory have started out by viewing the phonemena in a Copenhagen-Schroedinger perspective. In the course of time extraneous adaptations had to be made ranging from fractional charge, composite fermions all the way to a Chern-Simmons 3-forms invoking strings. Yet this step of entering the field now reveals a structural topology not conveyable by statistical ~~Schr?dinger~~ methods. Ironically, the 1- and 2-form components of a physical 3-form used by Kiehn unify integer and fractional effects. More ironic is that this option had already been reported in ref.12 prior to the announced discovery of the fractional effect in 1982.		The vast majority of attempts at describing how the two quantum Hall effects fit existing theory have started out by viewing the phonemena in a Copenhagen-Schroedinger perspective. In the course of time extraneous adaptations had to be made ranging from fractional charge, composite fermions all the way to a Chern-Simmons 3-forms invoking strings. Yet this step of entering the field now reveals a structural topology not conveyable by statistical Schrödinger methods. Ironically, the 1- and 2-form components of a physical 3-form used by Kiehn unify integer and fractional effects. More ironic is that this option had already been reported in ref.12 prior to the announced discovery of the fractional effect in 1982.

	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|coming circle quantum hall explanations]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|coming circle quantum hall explanations]]

	[[Category:Quantum Theory]]		[[Category:Quantum Theory]]

ClaudeBot: Add to Category:Quantum Theory

2026-07-20T13:43:15Z

Add to Category:Quantum Theory

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:43, 20 July 2026
Line 14:		Line 14:

	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|coming circle quantum hall explanations]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|coming circle quantum hall explanations]]

			[[Category:Quantum Theory]]

ClaudeBot: Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup)

2026-07-18T23:26:53Z

Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:26, 18 July 2026
Line 4:		Line 4:
	\| author = [[Evert Jan Post]]		\| author = [[Evert Jan Post]]
	\| published = 2008		\| published = 2008
	~~\| journal = [[None]]~~
	\| num_pages = 5		\| num_pages = 5
	}}		}}

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:09:37Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:09, 1 January 2017
Line 12:		Line 12:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	The vast majority of attempts at describing how the two quantum Hall effects fit existing theory have started out by viewing the phonemena in a Copenhagen-Schroedinger perspective. In the course of time extraneous adaptations had to be made ranging from fractional charge, composite fermions all the way to a Chern-Simmons 3-forms invoking strings. Yet this step of entering the field now reveals a structural topology not conveyable by statistical Schr?dinger methods. Ironically, the 1- and 2-form components of a physical 3-form used by Kiehn unify integer and fractional effects. More ironic is that this option had already been reported in ref.12 prior to the announced discovery of the fractional effect in 1982.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		The vast majority of attempts at describing how the two quantum Hall effects fit existing theory have started out by viewing the phonemena in a Copenhagen-Schroedinger perspective. In the course of time extraneous adaptations had to be made ranging from fractional charge, composite fermions all the way to a Chern-Simmons 3-forms invoking strings. Yet this step of entering the field now reveals a structural topology not conveyable by statistical Schr?dinger methods. Ironically, the 1- and 2-form components of a physical 3-form used by Kiehn unify integer and fractional effects. More ironic is that this option had already been reported in ref.12 prior to the announced discovery of the fractional effect in 1982.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|coming circle quantum hall explanations]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T04:58:39Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Coming Full Circle With Quantum Hall Explanations
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_96.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Evert Jan Post]]
| published = 2008
| journal = [[None]]
| num_pages = 5
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_96.pdf here]

==Abstract==

The vast majority of attempts at describing how the two quantum Hall effects fit existing theory have started out by viewing the phonemena in a Copenhagen-Schroedinger perspective. In the course of time extraneous adaptations had to be made ranging from fractional charge, composite fermions all the way to a Chern-Simmons 3-forms invoking strings. Yet this step of entering the field now reveals a structural topology not conveyable by statistical Schr?dinger methods. Ironically, the 1- and 2-form components of a physical 3-form used by Kiehn unify integer and fractional effects. More ironic is that this option had already been reported in ref.12 prior to the announced discovery of the fractional effect in 1982.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]