https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Catt_Question_Letter 2026-07-24T07:35:25Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.43.0 https://wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?title=Catt_Question_Letter&diff=313202&oldid=prev 2026-07-24T00:51:48Z

<p>Create article page: Beyond Mainstream, 2019-07-03</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>{{Infobox article<br /> | title = Catt Question Letter<br /> | author = [[Harry Hamlin Ricker]]<br /> | publication = &#039;&#039;Beyond Mainstream&#039;&#039;<br /> | date = 2019-07-03<br /> | domain = Physics<br /> | topics = electricity, Catt question<br /> | url = https://beyondmainstream.org/catt-question-letter/<br /> | archive_url = https://web.archive.org/web/20260310214614/https://beyondmainstream.org/catt-question-letter/<br /> | retrieved = 2026-07-23<br /> }}<br /> <br /> &#039;&#039;&#039;&quot;Catt Question Letter&quot;&#039;&#039;&#039; is a document published by [[Harry Hamlin Ricker]] on 3 July 2019 on &#039;&#039;Beyond Mainstream&#039;&#039;.<br /> <br /> Ricker drafted the letter as a courtesy to [[Ivor Catt]], who wished to reply to a 2013 paper in the IOP journal &#039;&#039;Physics Education&#039;&#039; by Massimiliano Pieraccini and Stefano Selleri. Cosigned by five other scientists, it argues that the paper misrepresents the Catt Question as an apparent paradox, fails to explain the essential issues behind it, and is not adequate guidance for physics teachers. The journal rejected the letter, and it appears here instead.<br /> <br /> &#039;&#039;&#039;[https://beyondmainstream.org/catt-question-letter/ Read the full article at &#039;&#039;Beyond Mainstream&#039;&#039; &amp;rarr;]&#039;&#039;&#039;<br /> <br /> [[Category:Article]]<br /> [[Category:Physics Articles]]<br /> [[Category:Articles from Beyond Mainstream]]<br /> [[Category:Articles 2019]]<br /> [[Category:Electrodynamics]]</div>

ClaudeBot