Big Breed Theory Recues the Big Bang - Revision history

ClaudeBot: Fill in keywords from the wiki's abstract records

2026-07-21T11:30:01Z

Fill in keywords from the wiki's abstract records

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:30, 21 July 2026
Line 3:		Line 3:
	\| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5444.pdf Link to paper]		\| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5444.pdf Link to paper]
	\| author = [[Ron Pearson]]		\| author = [[Ron Pearson]]
			\| keywords = Big Bang, Hubble constant, red shift
	\| published = 2010		\| published = 2010
	\| num_pages = 9		\| num_pages = 9

ClaudeBot: Add to Category:Big Bang

2026-07-20T13:40:22Z

Add to Category:Big Bang

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:40, 20 July 2026
Line 16:		Line 16:

	[[Category:Cosmology\|big breed theory recues big bang]]		[[Category:Cosmology\|big breed theory recues big bang]]

			[[Category:Big Bang]]

ClaudeBot: Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup)

2026-07-18T23:36:22Z

Remove empty None journal/publisher placeholder (dead red-link cleanup)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:36, 18 July 2026
Line 4:		Line 4:
	\| author = [[Ron Pearson]]		\| author = [[Ron Pearson]]
	\| published = 2010		\| published = 2010
	~~\| journal = [[None]]~~
	\| num_pages = 9		\| num_pages = 9
	}}		}}

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:21:53Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:21, 1 January 2017
Line 16:		Line 16:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|big breed theory recues big bang]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|big breed theory recues big bang]]

	[[Category:Cosmology]]		[[Category:Cosmology\|big breed theory recues big bang]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:05:59Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:05, 1 January 2017
Line 14:		Line 14:
	The collision breeding of opposed energies, from the void, provided all the big bang theory required. This happened long before that creative explosion of matter erupted. In this way the major false prediction invalidating the current big bang is resolved. As presently formulated the latter predicts a rate of expansion 10120 times too great! A fundamental feature of this supplementary theory is its prediction of the accelerating nature of expanding space. Credibility was gained by publication of the theory before discovery by astronomers in 1998: that the expansion of the universe is speeding up. Furthermore, worked out in detail, the theory provides a new way of interpreting red shift data from remote supernovae. This shows the true Hubble constant is less than half the currently accepted value Furthermore the Hubble law appears from the big breed theoretically and shows the expansion is accelerating. A surprising result is the shape of the predicted curve of red shift plotted against distance. This shows a rapid increase when nearing the growing edge of the universe. This appears to explain the observation of astronomers and their interpretation by ‘dark energy’. This explanation now has to be rejected.		The collision breeding of opposed energies, from the void, provided all the big bang theory required. This happened long before that creative explosion of matter erupted. In this way the major false prediction invalidating the current big bang is resolved. As presently formulated the latter predicts a rate of expansion 10120 times too great! A fundamental feature of this supplementary theory is its prediction of the accelerating nature of expanding space. Credibility was gained by publication of the theory before discovery by astronomers in 1998: that the expansion of the universe is speeding up. Furthermore, worked out in detail, the theory provides a new way of interpreting red shift data from remote supernovae. This shows the true Hubble constant is less than half the currently accepted value Furthermore the Hubble law appears from the big breed theoretically and shows the expansion is accelerating. A surprising result is the shape of the predicted curve of red shift plotted against distance. This shows a rapid increase when nearing the growing edge of the universe. This appears to explain the observation of astronomers and their interpretation by ‘dark energy’. This explanation now has to be rejected.

	[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|big breed theory recues big bang]]

	[[Category:Cosmology]]		[[Category:Cosmology]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T17:11:54Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = Big Breed Theory Recues the Big Bang
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5444.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Ron Pearson]]
| published = 2010
| journal = [[None]]
| num_pages = 9
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_5444.pdf here]

==Abstract==

The collision breeding of opposed energies, from the void, provided all the big bang theory required. This happened long before that creative explosion of matter erupted. In this way the major false prediction invalidating the current big bang is resolved. As presently formulated the latter predicts a rate of expansion 10120 times too great! A fundamental feature of this supplementary theory is its prediction of the accelerating nature of expanding space. Credibility was gained by publication of the theory before discovery by astronomers in 1998: that the expansion of the universe is speeding up. Furthermore, worked out in detail, the theory provides a new way of interpreting red shift data from remote supernovae. This shows the true Hubble constant is less than half the currently accepted value Furthermore the Hubble law appears from the big breed theoretically and shows the expansion is accelerating. A surprising result is the shape of the predicted curve of red shift plotted against distance. This shows a rapid increase when nearing the growing edge of the universe. This appears to explain the observation of astronomers and their interpretation by ‘dark energy’. This explanation now has to be rejected.

[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Cosmology]]