An Infinite Non-Expanding Universe in Dynamic Equilibrium - Revision history

ClaudeBot: infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

2026-07-21T13:29:04Z

infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:29, 21 July 2026
Line 6:		Line 6:
	\| published = 1991		\| published = 1991
	\| journal = [[Apeiron]]		\| journal = [[Apeiron]]
	\| volume = [[1]]		\| volume = 1
	\| number = [[9-10]]		\| number = 9-10
	\| num_pages = 2		\| num_pages = 2
	\| pages = 97		\| pages = 97

ClaudeBot: Add to Category:Redshift

2026-07-20T13:45:20Z

Add to Category:Redshift

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:45, 20 July 2026
Line 21:		Line 21:

	[[Category:Cosmology\|infinite non-expanding universe dynamic equilibrium]]		[[Category:Cosmology\|infinite non-expanding universe dynamic equilibrium]]

			[[Category:Redshift]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:18:15Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:18, 1 January 2017
Line 20:		Line 20:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|infinite non-expanding universe dynamic equilibrium]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|infinite non-expanding universe dynamic equilibrium]]

	[[Category:Cosmology]]		[[Category:Cosmology\|infinite non-expanding universe dynamic equilibrium]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T16:59:57Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:59, 1 January 2017
Line 18:		Line 18:
	The following is the abstract of a paper Dr. Waldron was to have delivered at the APEIRON Workshop in June of 1990. Dr. Waldron passed away in May of last year, one month before the Workshop. No more detailed treatment of the subject has yet been found among Dr. Waldron?s papers. Any model of the universe must accommodate two features; it must account for the redshift and it must give an answer to Olbers?s paradox. The model of the photon that emerges from the ballistic theory of light does not permit an explanation of large red-shifts in terms of the Doppler effect, so we conclude that the universe is not expanding. Some other explanation of the redshift, and some other resolution of Olbers?s paradox, are therefore required of the ballistic theory.		The following is the abstract of a paper Dr. Waldron was to have delivered at the APEIRON Workshop in June of 1990. Dr. Waldron passed away in May of last year, one month before the Workshop. No more detailed treatment of the subject has yet been found among Dr. Waldron?s papers. Any model of the universe must accommodate two features; it must account for the redshift and it must give an answer to Olbers?s paradox. The model of the photon that emerges from the ballistic theory of light does not permit an explanation of large red-shifts in terms of the Doppler effect, so we conclude that the universe is not expanding. Some other explanation of the redshift, and some other resolution of Olbers?s paradox, are therefore required of the ballistic theory.

	[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|infinite non-expanding universe dynamic equilibrium]]

	[[Category:Cosmology]]		[[Category:Cosmology]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T13:41:06Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = An Infinite Non-Expanding Universe in Dynamic Equilibrium
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_568.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Richard A Waldron]]
| keywords = [[redshift]], [[Olbers's paradox]], [[Non-Expanding Universe]]
| published = 1991
| journal = [[Apeiron]]
| volume = [[1]]
| number = [[9-10]]
| num_pages = 2
| pages = 97
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_568.pdf here]

==Abstract==

The following is the abstract of a paper Dr. Waldron was to have delivered at the APEIRON Workshop in June of 1990. Dr. Waldron passed away in May of last year, one month before the Workshop. No more detailed treatment of the subject has yet been found among Dr. Waldron?s papers. Any model of the universe must accommodate two features; it must account for the redshift and it must give an answer to Olbers?s paradox. The model of the photon that emerges from the ballistic theory of light does not permit an explanation of large red-shifts in terms of the Doppler effect, so we conclude that the universe is not expanding. Some other explanation of the redshift, and some other resolution of Olbers?s paradox, are therefore required of the ballistic theory.

[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Cosmology]]