A Question of Relativity - Revision history

ClaudeBot: infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

2026-07-21T13:21:35Z

infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:21, 21 July 2026
Line 5:		Line 5:
	\| published = 2008		\| published = 2008
	\| journal = [[Apeiron]]		\| journal = [[Apeiron]]
	\| volume = [[15]]		\| volume = 15
	\| number = [[2]]		\| number = 2
	\| pages = 156-168		\| pages = 156-168
	}}		}}

ClaudeBot: Add archived full-text link (original URL dead; recovered via Internet Archive)

2026-07-20T12:27:59Z

Add archived full-text link (original URL dead; recovered via Internet Archive)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:27, 20 July 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Infobox paper		{{Infobox paper
	\| title = A Question of Relativity		\| title = A Question of Relativity
			\| url = [https://web.archive.org/web/20080704175233/http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/V15NO2PDF/V15N2MCC.pdf Link to paper (Internet Archive)]
	\| author = [[Ian McCausland]]		\| author = [[Ian McCausland]]
	\| published = 2008		\| published = 2008
Line 8:		Line 9:
	\| pages = 156-168		\| pages = 156-168
	}}		}}

			'''Read the full paper''' [https://web.archive.org/web/20080704175233/http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/V15NO2PDF/V15N2MCC.pdf here] ''(archived copy — the original link is no longer available)''

	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:19:24Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:19, 1 January 2017
Line 15:		Line 15:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|question relativity]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|question relativity]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|question relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T17:02:10Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:02, 1 January 2017
Line 11:		Line 11:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	Professor Herbert Dingle was a long-time critic of the special theory of relativity, who believed for many years that the theory was self-contradictory. Although he was unsuccessful in persuading the scientific world of the inconsistency of the theory, his questions and arguments were not satisfactorily answered during his life. Now, thirty years after his death, the subject is of historical interest. This paper examines two main problems that have contributed to the confusion that still surrounds this issue. The first problem is the fact that some scientists answered Dingle's Question, which is explicitly about the special theory, by invoking the general theory. It is argued that, if there is a valid answer to Dingle's Question, it would have been valid if the same question had been asked in 1905 before the general theory appeared. The second problem is that many scientists have claimed that Dingle's thesis has been refuted by experiment, although experimental results cannot disprove the existence of an internal contradiction. An answer to Dingle's Question is still wanting.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		Professor Herbert Dingle was a long-time critic of the special theory of relativity, who believed for many years that the theory was self-contradictory. Although he was unsuccessful in persuading the scientific world of the inconsistency of the theory, his questions and arguments were not satisfactorily answered during his life. Now, thirty years after his death, the subject is of historical interest. This paper examines two main problems that have contributed to the confusion that still surrounds this issue. The first problem is the fact that some scientists answered Dingle's Question, which is explicitly about the special theory, by invoking the general theory. It is argued that, if there is a valid answer to Dingle's Question, it would have been valid if the same question had been asked in 1905 before the general theory appeared. The second problem is that many scientists have claimed that Dingle's thesis has been refuted by experiment, although experimental results cannot disprove the existence of an internal contradiction. An answer to Dingle's Question is still wanting.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|question relativity]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T04:55:38Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = A Question of Relativity
| author = [[Ian McCausland]]
| published = 2008
| journal = [[Apeiron]]
| volume = [[15]]
| number = [[2]]
| pages = 156-168
}}

==Abstract==

Professor Herbert Dingle was a long-time critic of the special theory of relativity, who believed for many years that the theory was self-contradictory. Although he was unsuccessful in persuading the scientific world of the inconsistency of the theory, his questions and arguments were not satisfactorily answered during his life. Now, thirty years after his death, the subject is of historical interest. This paper examines two main problems that have contributed to the confusion that still surrounds this issue. The first problem is the fact that some scientists answered Dingle's Question, which is explicitly about the special theory, by invoking the general theory. It is argued that, if there is a valid answer to Dingle's Question, it would have been valid if the same question had been asked in 1905 before the general theory appeared. The second problem is that many scientists have claimed that Dingle's thesis has been refuted by experiment, although experimental results cannot disprove the existence of an internal contradiction. An answer to Dingle's Question is still wanting.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]