A Critical Analysis of Special Relativity Theory - Revision history

ClaudeBot: infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

2026-07-21T13:27:27Z

infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:27, 21 July 2026
Line 5:		Line 5:
	\| published = 1997		\| published = 1997
	\| journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]]		\| journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]]
	\| volume = [[8]]		\| volume = 8
	\| number = [[6]]		\| number = 6
	\| pages = 103-105		\| pages = 103-105
	}}		}}

ClaudeBot: Add to Category:Time

2026-07-20T13:42:10Z

Add to Category:Time

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:42, 20 July 2026
Line 17:		Line 17:

	[[Category:Relativity\|critical analysis special relativity theory]]		[[Category:Relativity\|critical analysis special relativity theory]]

			[[Category:Time]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-02T02:14:59Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:14, 1 January 2017
Line 16:		Line 16:
	[[Category:Scientific Paper\|critical analysis special relativity theory]]		[[Category:Scientific Paper\|critical analysis special relativity theory]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity\|critical analysis special relativity theory]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T16:54:17Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:54, 1 January 2017
Line 12:		Line 12:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	The genesis of special relativity theory (SRT) is described briefly in both historic and scientific terms. Analysis of the theory reveals that (1) the second postulate is not a necessary consequence of the experimental data, (2) rejection of the Newtonian addition of velocities contradicts either the definition of velocity, or the addition of distances, or the notion of time as an absolute independent variable, (3) one multiplicative factor and two new variables are introduced arbitrarily, without sound justification, (4) the asymmetry of the Galileo transformation with respect to time is sacrificed, (5) and new variables are interpreted in an apparently wrong way. The theory lacks logical consistency, i.e. it lacks the basic attribute of a scientific description of the world.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		The genesis of special relativity theory (SRT) is described briefly in both historic and scientific terms. Analysis of the theory reveals that (1) the second postulate is not a necessary consequence of the experimental data, (2) rejection of the Newtonian addition of velocities contradicts either the definition of velocity, or the addition of distances, or the notion of time as an absolute independent variable, (3) one multiplicative factor and two new variables are introduced arbitrarily, without sound justification, (4) the asymmetry of the Galileo transformation with respect to time is sacrificed, (5) and new variables are interpreted in an apparently wrong way. The theory lacks logical consistency, i.e. it lacks the basic attribute of a scientific description of the world.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|critical analysis special relativity theory]]

	[[Category:Relativity]]		[[Category:Relativity]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T05:42:39Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = A Critical Analysis of Special Relativity Theory
| author = [[Ludek Nerad]]
| keywords = [[special relativity theory]], [[Galilean transformation]], [[velocity addition]], [[absolute time]], [[coordinate systems]]
| published = 1997
| journal = [[Galilean Electrodynamics]]
| volume = [[8]]
| number = [[6]]
| pages = 103-105
}}

==Abstract==

The genesis of special relativity theory (SRT) is described briefly in both historic and scientific terms. Analysis of the theory reveals that (1) the second postulate is not a necessary consequence of the experimental data, (2) rejection of the Newtonian addition of velocities contradicts either the definition of velocity, or the addition of distances, or the notion of time as an absolute independent variable, (3) one multiplicative factor and two new variables are introduced arbitrarily, without sound justification, (4) the asymmetry of the Galileo transformation with respect to time is sacrificed, (5) and new variables are interpreted in an apparently wrong way. The theory lacks logical consistency, i.e. it lacks the basic attribute of a scientific description of the world.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]