A Comparative Analysis of Protein Homology Detection Methods - Revision history

ClaudeBot: infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

2026-07-21T13:32:34Z

infobox: unlink bare volume/issue numbers (removes redlinks to numeric titles)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:32, 21 July 2026
Line 6:		Line 6:
	\| published = 2003		\| published = 2003
	\| journal = [[Journal of Theoretics]]		\| journal = [[Journal of Theoretics]]
	\| volume = [[5]]		\| volume = 5
	\| number = [[4]]		\| number = 4
	\| num_pages = 7		\| num_pages = 7
	}}		}}

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2017-01-01T16:53:57Z

Imported from text file

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:53, 1 January 2017
Line 15:		Line 15:
	==Abstract==		==Abstract==

	Functional annotation of new gene sequences is an important challenge for computational biology systems. While much progress has been made towards improving experimental methods for functional assignment to putative genes, most current genomic annotation methods rely on computational solutions for homology modeling via sequence or structural similarity. With the increasing number of computer methods available for protein remote homologies detection, a comparative evaluation of the methods from biological prospective is warranted. This study uses benchmark SCOP dataset to test and compare the ability of five different computational methods for protein homologies detection. The results provide insight to biologist as to usage, value, and reliability of the numerous methods available.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]		Functional annotation of new gene sequences is an important challenge for computational biology systems. While much progress has been made towards improving experimental methods for functional assignment to putative genes, most current genomic annotation methods rely on computational solutions for homology modeling via sequence or structural similarity. With the increasing number of computer methods available for protein remote homologies detection, a comparative evaluation of the methods from biological prospective is warranted. This study uses benchmark SCOP dataset to test and compare the ability of five different computational methods for protein homologies detection. The results provide insight to biologist as to usage, value, and reliability of the numerous methods available.

			[[Category:Scientific Paper\|comparative analysis protein homology detection methods]]

Maintenance script: Imported from text file

2016-12-30T16:36:59Z

Imported from text file

New page

{{Infobox paper
| title = A Comparative Analysis of Protein Homology Detection Methods
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_839.pdf Link to paper]
| author = [[Nazar M Zaki]]
| keywords = [[Homology detection]], [[hidden Marko model]], [[protein classification]], [[support vector machines]]
| published = 2003
| journal = [[Journal of Theoretics]]
| volume = [[5]]
| number = [[4]]
| num_pages = 7
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_839.pdf here]

==Abstract==

Functional annotation of new gene sequences is an important challenge for computational biology systems. While much progress has been made towards improving experimental methods for functional assignment to putative genes, most current genomic annotation methods rely on computational solutions for homology modeling via sequence or structural similarity. With the increasing number of computer methods available for protein remote homologies detection, a comparative evaluation of the methods from biological prospective is warranted. This study uses benchmark SCOP dataset to test and compare the ability of five different computational methods for protein homologies detection. The results provide insight to biologist as to usage, value, and reliability of the numerous methods available.[[Category:Scientific Paper]]