View source for The Point of Unification in Theoretical Physics

{{Infobox paper
| title = The Point of Unification in Theoretical Physics
| url = [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_paperlink_7066.docx Link to paper]
| author = [[James E Beichler]]
| keywords = [[Single Field Theory]], [[unification]], [[quantum]], [[quantized space-tme]], [[Einstein]], [[Kaluza]], [[Clifford]]
| published = 2013
| num_pages = 10
}}

'''Read the full paper''' [http://www.naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_paperlink_7066.docx here]

==Abstract==

It would seem to many physicists that the unification of physics within a single paradigmatic theory has been the primary goal in science for only the past few decades, but this would not be true. Unification was the original goal of Einstein and a few other physicists from the 1920s to the 1960s, before quantum theorists began to think in terms of unification. However, both approaches are basically flawed because they are individually incomplete as they now stand. Had either side of the controversy just simplified their worldview and sought commonality between the two, unification would have been accomplished long ago. The point is, literally, that the discrete quantum, continuous relativity, basic physical geometry and classical physics all share one common characteristic &ndash; a paradoxical duality between a dimensionless point and an extended length in any dimension &ndash; and if the problem of unification is approached from an understanding of how this problem relates to each paradigm all of physics could be unified under a single new theoretical paradigm.

[[Category:Scientific Paper|Scientific Paper]]

[[Category:Relativity]]

[[Category:Quantum Theory]]